The Jewish finance-capitalists international centre-right and Judeo-Bolshevism international socialism are both abberations that suppress the nation - the natural level of political, cultural, and economic life.

I have to disagree with the civic nationalists a la Renan. Culture is not in itself what binds people together as a nation, it is an expression of something much deeper. It is based on a connection and a birthright established by blood through countless generations. It forges a collective spirit, and as such produces the conditions for people to bind themselves under a government for their common good.

Even the liberals here in effect concede this, otherwise they would want to abolish national parliaments in favour for a world government. The fact is a national interest does exist, and unlike fleeting conflicts based on class and such things that change with socioeconomic bla bla conditions, it always will exist. It is the entire basis of political life.

The twentieth centry was somewhat of an abberation in that class conflict temporarily transcended national interests. But that is less the case nowadays, and I think this is reflected in the rise of the 'New Right' across Europe.

This is why a British person asks why they should be governed by Brussels, but thinks nothing of it to be governed by London, even if he lives up in Newcastle or Inverness. Sometimes you've got to think about these seemingly obvious things when you take them for granted - get back to the basics.

The nation is relevant and it isn't going to disappear any time soon.