I have Never Read An article with which I have so Vehemently Disagreed

[Fragony]

Way more "innocents" have been killed by collateral damage than in suicide attacks, so who can say one is worse than the other?

Don't shoot rockets from urban area's if collateral damage makes you a sad panda, I couldn't care less

the heart of the problem;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu6Ond1ESq8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLKk...eature=related from 10:00

^ perfectly normal tv

[Hax]

They did this after decades of using the same tactics, the best Al-Quaida have EVER done is 9/11 and that only worked because it was a complete blindside.

Dar es-Salaam?

[Philippus Flavius Homovallumus]

And here I thought - it is sweet and fitting to die for one's country.

Your post lack taste.

My post lacks taste, or my posts lack taste?

Regardless, going to war is risking death, blowing yourself up is suicide. While the point has been somewhat obscurred in modern warfare - war is not about dying, or killing the enemy, it is about winning. That can be done without a single injury, though it is very difficult.

Dar es-Salaam?

...has not been repeated, which is my point. Meanwhile, Gerry Adams, terrorist par excellence is Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland, they've never been able to pin anything on him - including being at Bloody Sunday.

[Hax]

...has not been repeated, which is my point. Meanwhile, Gerry Adams, terrorist par excellence is Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland, they've never been able to pin anything on him - including being at Bloody Sunday.

But you said that al-Qaeda has not been able to repeatedly do terrorist stuff?