Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Geographical concerns...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Geographical concerns...

    Since the provinces preview I was amazed by how impressive mountains looked, but remember it to be WIP...
    What I'm wondering is if such regions will be so easily crossed in EB II, for example the Alps looked like swiss cheese
    I mean historically speaking such routes were hard for their nature, the amount of hostile tribes or were easy?
    Shouldn't be possible, by elevating the "walkable" terrain aswell, to render the crossing longer or with other tweaks?
    Last edited by Arjos; 06-10-2011 at 03:44.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Geographical concerns...

    Remember an EB turn lasts for three months. Hannibal crossed the Alps in 16 days. So the movement rate across the Alps is fine as it is, IMO.

    Putting a constantly-renewing force of rebel mountain tribesmen would be a good idea, though, so no army can get through there without a fight.

  3. #3
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: Geographical concerns...

    Right, so it wasn't that hard as it's been told, I live in that very area more or less and yes must give credit for bringing elephants, but the pass in itself is quite easy...
    Maybe the real challenge stood all in the "unknown", so once help from natives is gained or passes are discovered it's a walk...

  4. #4

    Default Re: Geographical concerns...

    EB1 did have that constantly respawning rebel force, didn't it? In the form of gold and silver chevroned rebel stacks of alpine and celtic troops near some alpine settlements.

    Subduing the Alps certainly is an extremely expensive and intensive operation for any faction in EB1, which is as it was historically. I think it was only Augustus who finally conquered the Alps, before that even though the Romans ruled everything around it for hundreds of miles they did not directly control the tribes there.
    Last edited by Randal; 06-11-2011 at 08:42.

  5. #5
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: Geographical concerns...

    I've mentioned the Alps just as an example, like the Pyrenees and Caucasus mountains had only 2 accesses...
    Also how about marshy lands? The Persians never gained fully control of the Nile delta and those very petty rulers' descendants leaded a major revolt before the macedonian invasion...
    I've been thinking since EBII will have "populations buildings" couldn't they act as a resource to remove a crossing penalty (representing both harrassing tribes and unknown passes), once those inhabitants became happy with the rulers?
    Last edited by Arjos; 06-11-2011 at 09:03.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Geographical concerns...

    Another way would be to use the "desertion" system in MTW:II. Remember: When the Pope signalled a crusade, and you joined the Crusade => Then straying afar from the goal, or not making enough progress/engaging Catholic Christian factions would turn your army into a deserter army, which would slowly disappear due to men leaving your army. This could be through some signifacant modding and trait adjustment be used, to simulate the loss of men due to attrition (in desert areas/cold areas) guerilla tactics used by Germanic, and mountainious tribes, desert tribes exct. I believe due to engine limitations (the lack of infinite turns) simulating accurate army movements is near impossible, however as you mentioned, there should be respawning Rebel forces in small numbers. Another way arround this is the trait system. During winter for example your armies (with the exception of factions who were used to winter combat) recieved a movement penalty. This could be used through some sort of trigger (perhaps engaging one of these rebel stacks in the mountains) the following [which would be used in other, situations]:
    Bold move [-25% movement; ?%? of units killed by attrition through use of desertion]
    This general has taken on the task of crossing terrain that during this period had little to none roads, suffered from different types of natural dangers such as snow storms, desert storms, the rising of the tide, moorlands, dangerous fauna and fungii, which took a toll on those armies that attempted to cross such dangerous areas.

    Then again, if we use the desertion system, we need a substitute for the College of Cardinals, and the Pope, which don't get me wrong would be great, but would take alot of work, and even then intresting bugs would occur, when persay the Swéboz would be told by the Consul of Rome to engage against Alexandria on a whim :P [OFC the EBII team stated they will not use this system/atleast they have denied their plans up about the usage of the Papacy/up to this point to my knowledge]

    - Diodredai

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO