EB Online EDU v2.1 - RELEASE!

[Lazy O]

They would be very much worth it if cavalry were real cavalry and could kill slings and archers within seconds!!!!!!!

And why in bloody hell do Chalkispedes cost only 2400? Being elites phalanx with 15 morale?

/rant

[Vega]

that is a stupid question lazy, what about iberian assault infratry whos can smash roman cohorts without problems and they cost only 2200

[Lazy O]

Because they are not very good against most other stuff?. neitos also cost 2200, cohorts are cheaper, so it makes sense that they lose.

[Brave Brave Sir Robin]

Haha, cohorts are substantially cheaper in fact.

[Aulus Caecina Severus]

Haha, cohorts are substantially cheaper in fact.

Cohors are substantially underpowered as more as possible.
Playing mp, legionaries simply do not count.
Roman player could save himself only with his cavalry (at least decent), then not in roman way.

[-Stormrage-]

Cohors are substantially underpowered as more as possible.

Since when is a heavily armored, sword armed, 100 man unit, that costs less then 2000 minai, UNDERPOWERED?

im not very inteligble about roman troops so i might be missing something here.

[Kival]

Since when is a heavily armored, sword armed, 100 man unit, that costs less then 2000 minai, UNDERPOWERED?

im not very inteligble about roman troops so i might be missing something here.

You forgot the pilum which is an ap-jav. Roman Cohors are surely not underpowered.

[antisocialmunky]

Cohors are substantially underpowered as more as possible.
Playing mp, legionaries simply do not count.
Roman player could save himself only with his cavalry (at least decent), then not in roman way.

You have elites like Praetorians now. Its not so much that legions are weaker but everything is better so you can't sit in guard mode forever :p

Also ACS used to use phalanx too in really annoying way.