Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 153

Thread: Who was innocent

  1. #1
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Who was innocent

    If you try to brainwash children into sympathising with child-killers, what does it make you.

    What are these youth-camps exactly. Oh the irony. Heard that on the day prior to the attack a game was organised where the kids wearing paliflags had to break the blockade. Not all that weird because it's Norway but even our hardcore antisemit socialist party wouldn't brainwash young minds like that. If I hear things like that I find it kinda hard to get worked up about them dying by the hands of a terrorist. Labour shame on you, like crocodiles they cry when they bite. They are probably too leftist to understand that they aren't allowed to skullfrak kids this way, I'm not going to apologise on behalf of the right anymore, hate was planted there and hate is what they got. Poor kids, but labour-jugend ain't that far off
    Last edited by Fragony; 07-31-2011 at 10:19.

  2. #2
    Member Centurion1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wherever my blade takes me or to school, it sorta depends
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Ahhhhhhhhhhhh this is going to end badly.

  3. #3
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    In before teh lock.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

  4. #4
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Why lock it? It's tasteless and over the top as usual, but Frags touches on a topic that is relevant.

    Norwegian intellectuals and politicians are generally pretty naive when it comes to the Middle East. Emulating the Gaza fleet on Utoya must have been a pretty stupid game, as well as childish. We know that said fleet is organised by shady characters and organisations, mostly islamists and their western admirers. In that sense Fragony is right. But the kids didn't deserve to die for it. That's just Fragony's way of coping with a horrible world.

    But there is an issue here. For instance I have always wondered why a mouth-foaming islamomidget like mullah Krekar has been tolerated in Norway for so long, whereas an Israel-propagandist like Dershowitz is not allowed to speak at Norwegian universities.

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  5. #5
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Of course they didn't have to die, but that stepherd-wife smile Norway freaks me out. Creepy that they have these indoctrination-camps, nothing childish about it, it's malicious. Gutmensch never ceases to amaze me

  6. #6
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    Gutmensch never ceases to amaze me
    Gutmensch has his accomplishments, even with regard to the Middle East he can bridge a gap that others can't.

    There is an uncanny parallel here, too. Israelis killed 19 unarmed people on the previous Gaza fleet, Breivik killed dozens of unarmed youngsters shortly after they mimicked the present Gaza fleet.

    No reason to be so starry-eyed about Israel, me boy.

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  7. #7
    The Rhetorician Member Skullheadhq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Antioch
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    Of course they didn't have to die, but that stepherd-wife smile Norway freaks me out. Creepy that they have these indoctrination-camps, nothing childish about it, it's malicious. Gutmensch never ceases to amaze me
    That's because political youth camps are by definition misguided. Why would kids have to organize politically and then go to an awkward, everyone-thinks-the-same camp? It just makes no sense.
    Last edited by Banquo's Ghost; 07-31-2011 at 18:37.
    "When the candles are out all women are fair."
    -Plutarch, Coniugia Praecepta 46

  8. #8
    Hǫrðar Member Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Hordaland, Norway
    Posts
    6,449

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    If you try to brainwash children into sympathising with child-killers, what does it make you.
    The sympathy does not lie with the killers of children, duh. What does such an overstatement make you.


    Quote Originally Posted by Adrian II View Post
    But there is an issue here. For instance I have always wondered why a mouth-foaming islamomidget like mullah Krekar has been tolerated in Norway for so long, whereas an Israel-propagandist like Dershowitz is not allowed to speak at Norwegian universities.
    Krekar is not at all being tolerated, but because chances are he will receive the death sentence if he returns to Iraq, he will not be returned at present.

    Quote Originally Posted by Skullhead View Post
    That's because political youth camps are by definition misguided. Why would kids have to organize politically and then go to an awkward, everyone-thinks-the-same camp? It just makes no sense.
    I don't know much about what was going on this annual AUF camp, but political youth camps do sound creepy to me as well. I think most parties here have similar gatherings, though precise details evade my memory.
    Last edited by Banquo's Ghost; 07-31-2011 at 18:38. Reason: Edited quote
    Runes for good luck:

    [1 - exp(i*2π)]^-1

  9. #9
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Viking View Post
    Krekar is not at all being tolerated [...]
    Oh, but he is. In 2007 the Norwegian Supreme Court ruled that Krekar was a 'threat to Norway's national security'. He has since uttered death threads against Norwegian politicians as well as loads of other 'enemies'. So why isn't he convicted? Why isn't he even incarcerated?

    Do the Norwegian security services have a deal with him, that they will leave him alone if he won't order attacsk on Norwegian soil?

    The Brits have tried for years to manage their islamist underworld in this manner: just leave them alone as long as they perpetrate their murders in France, Germany and elsewhere and we don't look bad. Well, they got their comeuppance in 2005. Norway will have to deal decisively with Krekar. That is in the interest of Norwegian muslims as well as Norway as a whole.

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  10. #10
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Krekar is so far from a threath to our nation than you can get. He has stayed here for 20 years, no bombs so far. If he wished to blow up something here, I'm quite sure he would have done it already. Now, if they had charged him with war crimes in Iraq or something like that, they might be onto something. But a threath against national security? Laughable.

    Onto the nature of Utøya.

    It is NOT a kids summer camp. Not in any way. Its not a place where parents send their kids.

    AUF has two national events. One is the national party meeting, usually in october, where the politics, leadership, etc is decided. The other is Utøya, where all that stuff is debated. Youth parties in Norway have an active role in politics, and Utøya is how AUF prepares itself on a national level for the upcoming election. The rest of the time is spent debating and socializing.

    Most are in their late teens/early twenties. To call them kids is to flaunt your ignorance openly.

    A game where people play with flags and such? I call BS.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  11. #11
    The Rhetorician Member Skullheadhq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Antioch
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Krekar is so far from a threath to our nation than you can get. He has stayed here for 20 years, no bombs so far. If he wished to blow up something here, I'm quite sure he would have done it already. Now, if they had charged him with war crimes in Iraq or something like that, they might be onto something. But a threath against national security? Laughable.

    Onto the nature of Utøya.

    It is NOT a kids summer camp. Not in any way. Its not a place where parents send their kids.

    AUF has two national events. One is the national party meeting, usually in october, where the politics, leadership, etc is decided. The other is Utøya, where all that stuff is debated. Youth parties in Norway have an active role in politics, and Utøya is how AUF prepares itself on a national level for the upcoming election. The rest of the time is spent debating and socializing.

    Most are in their late teens/early twenties. To call them kids is to flaunt your ignorance openly.

    A game where people play with flags and such? I call BS.
    LOL, Labour party policy is largely set out by kids, that explains a lot....
    "When the candles are out all women are fair."
    -Plutarch, Coniugia Praecepta 46

  12. #12
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Call it what you want. But it has indoctrination written all over it. Creepy

    'LOL, Labour party policy is largely set out by kids, that explains a lot.... '

    I lol'ed
    Last edited by Fragony; 07-31-2011 at 13:35.

  13. #13
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Skullhead View Post
    LOL, Labour party policy is largely set out by kids, that explains a lot....
    No.

    Every party in Norway has a youth party like AUF, and they all fuction in the same way. All of them also have two main events, the national party meeting and a socializer. The communists meet on Tromøya in the south, AUF has Utøya, the progress party youth meets in vestfold, etc etc. This is how Norwegian politics works, if you believe it to be indoctrination, then I'm sorry, but you are then a trifle mistaken.

    And for the last time, youth does NOT mean kids. Youth is defined as anyone up to the age of 33. Most youth party members are around 20, while most of the influential ones(eskil pedersen, røe isaksen, hovland, etc) are in their late twenties.

    The primary role of youth parties is to campaign towards the 18-30 age group, host school debates and subsequent school elections.
    Last edited by Banquo's Ghost; 07-31-2011 at 18:41. Reason: Removed personal attack
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  14. #14
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Krekar is so far from a threath to our nation than you can get.
    Your Supreme Court seems to disagree. And the UN too since they put him on their terrorist list.

    He has stayed here for 20 years, no bombs so far.
    Not in Norway. In Iraq, however: car bombs, suicide bombings, threats to kill all Christians. Hence my question: does Norway have a 'British' deal with this guy, turning a blind eye so long as he does his killing elsewhere?

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  15. #15
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    .....and that would kinda be my point, wouldn't it?

    Krekar is a threat to Iraq. So charge him on being a threat to Iraq then!

    Anyways, the reason he isn't sent out is because of that pesky little book called 'Norwegian Law', which says we can't send people to places where they risk execution. Iraq would be such a place. Hence, he stays.
    Last edited by HoreTore; 07-31-2011 at 13:51.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  16. #16
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    'if you believe it to be indoctrination, then I'm sorry, but you are then a trifle mistaken.'

    That is of course perfectly possible. What would you call it, awareness probably. If it isn't indoctrination it's at least social control. And even if it isn't that it's still pushy. .

    Why do they have paliflags anyway, what does it have to do with Norway
    Last edited by Banquo's Ghost; 07-31-2011 at 18:42. Reason: Edited quote

  17. #17
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Krekar is a threat to Iraq. So charge him on being a threat to Iraq then!
    No, he is a threat to Norway. The old imbecile even threated a Norwegian minister, a representative of the country that kept him safe for 14 years, with death.

    Don't send him to Iraq or the US where they will torture him and use his 'confessions' to harm even more innocents. Send him to jail.

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  18. #18
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Adrian II View Post
    No, he is a threat to Norway. The old imbecile even threated a Norwegian minister, a representative of the country that kept him safe for 14 years, with death.

    Don't send him to Iraq or the US where they will torture him and use his 'confessions' to harm even more innocents. Send him to jail.

    AII
    That particular incident is recent and under investigation, Adrian.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  19. #19
    The Rhetorician Member Skullheadhq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Antioch
    Posts
    2,267

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Adrian II View Post
    or the US where they will torture him and use his 'confessions' to harm even more innocents.
    Who could have said this 15 years ago?
    "When the candles are out all women are fair."
    -Plutarch, Coniugia Praecepta 46

  20. #20
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Adrian II View Post
    No, he is a threat to Norway. The old imbecile even threated a Norwegian minister, a representative of the country that kept him safe for 14 years, with death.

    Don't send him to Iraq or the US where they will torture him and use his 'confessions' to harm even more innocents. Send him to jail.

    AII
    I don't understand it all that much either, Stocholm by proxy or something like that. A lot of western confusion in any case, glad you are immune for that, I'd almost vote on you.

    I still thing he should just be dumped in Iraq, or with his butt painted red with Bakito

  21. #21
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Fragony View Post
    A lot of western confusion in any case, glad you are immune for that, I'd almost vote on you.
    Mensch! Don't vote for a money-grubbing pinko centralist Francophile.

    Seriously, I have always been critical of western capitals that gave islamists too much money, respectability and logistic leeway. 'Londonistan' for instance has become a festering sore. The US has discovered that financing and arming Quran-toting 'freedom fighters' wasn't such a good idea. The Dutch have found out that their policy of scientific openness helped Pakistan develop its nuclear bomb.

    Such developments have harmed western interests as well as the standing of millions of hard-working, decent, law-abiding, hospitable and friendly muslims on western soil.

    So maybe it's time for a rethink eh?

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  22. #22
    Senior Member Senior Member Fisherking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    East of Augusta Vindelicorum
    Posts
    5,575

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    As to the original topic of this discussion;

    What is so amazing about all this?

    People have indoctrinated youth since mankind began.

    When we agree with it we call it in favorable terms and when we disagree we call it atrocious behavior.

    Normally parents or society at large teach children how to view the world. If you pass them over to political organizations you should not be surprised that they may instill a narrower view based on their own beliefs to those in their charge.


    Education: that which reveals to the wise,
    and conceals from the stupid,
    the vast limits of their knowledge.
    Mark Twain

  23. #23
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Yes, Utøya is a place of indoctranation, because they hold debates there. Because, you know, in a debate you only ever get one argument.

    No, wait?

    A youth party is a political party. What happens at their events is political stuff. The ones attending are politicans, the only remarkable thing is that they are all in their late teens/twenties. A hefty percentage of them are already voted into office, most locally, but a few occupy some of the 169 seats of parliament.

    They're not being indoctrinated, if anything they would be the ones who would indoctrinate others.

    And for the record, I was there in 2008. As a communist spy, of course....

    Edit: crank out google translate, and read about the evil indoctrination the conservative youth party is planning to do:

    http://ungehoyre.no/organisasjonen/skolering.html
    Last edited by HoreTore; 07-31-2011 at 15:20.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  24. #24
    A very, very Senior Member Adrian II's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    9,748

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Indoctrination usually means that people are force-fed certain views or an entire lifestyle, to the exclusion of everything else. No other sources of information are allowed, and those protesting the indoctrination are isolated and punished. That's what happened in the Hitler Jugend. There is not even a semblance of a parallel to Utoya. Those who think otherwise are retards, hysterics or Glenn Beck.

    AII
    The bloody trouble is we are only alive when we’re half dead trying to get a paragraph right. - Paul Scott

  25. #25
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    'So maybe it's time for a rethink eh?'

    That would be lovely

    'Yes, Utøya is a place of indoctranation, because they hold debates there. Because, you know, in a debate you only ever get one argument.'

    If the organization organises a break the blockade game I'd say the debate was already kinda settled.
    Last edited by Fragony; 07-31-2011 at 15:32.

  26. #26
    Near East TW Mod Leader Member Cute Wolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    In ancient Middle East, driving Assyrian war machines...
    Posts
    3,991
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    Quote Originally Posted by Skullhead View Post
    That's because political youth camps are by definition retarded. Why would kids have to organize politically and then go to an awkward, everyone-thinks-the-same camp? It just makes no sense.
    they imitate muslim madrasah system *cough* emulate the muslims *cough*

    but even with that, killing unarmed defenseless childs are by definition utter coward

    My Projects : * Near East Total War * Nusantara Total War * Assyria Total War *
    * Watch the mind-blowing game : My Little Ponies : The Mafia Game!!! *

    Also known as SPIKE in TWC

  27. #27
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    People join a political party to find like-minded people. They study, roleplay together, sing songs. Religious organisations are for people of like-minded religious persuasion. They pary together, sing. Civic organisations may go on camp together to preserve nature, or for cultural reasons, or for a fantasy new age mediaevil fair. It's what people do. These kids, this camp ground, is neither innocent nor guilty. It is just people gathering together. Democracy does not mean an absense of political and religious activism, or an absense of the recruitment of youth.

    Democracy means the absense of a fight to the death with those of different persuasion. And fascism is the ideology that describes difference as enmity, as a struggle for supremacy, which seeks total eradication of those of different peruasion.




    As a nudist, I disagree with wearing clothes. I shall now go to a children's 'dress like your favourite animal!' party to shoot them all, this Hitlerjugend who are indoctrinated into wearing clothes in public, these multiclothist shock troops.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  28. #28
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    'These kids, this camp ground, is neither innocent nor guilty.'

    Sure. But a little bit of reflection from the left isn't all that much to ask for imho

  29. #29
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    wrong post
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  30. #30

    Default Re: Who was innocent

    @Fragony: in case you missed it, according to HoreTore they did not have a “break the blockade” game.

    EDIT: Btw, if I understand this correctly, similar camps are held by pretty much any mainstream political party in the Neds as well once there is an active “youth” part anyway. 'Course PVV being what it is might prefer not to host such events.
    Last edited by Tellos Athenaios; 07-31-2011 at 17:56.
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO