Netherworld III: Final Judgment [Concluded]

[Romanic]

Vote: glyphz

I believe I have mentioned my penchant for ties on numerous occasions.

You could tie Fluffy to the lead instead.

[TheLastDays]

Well, firstly it's worth summarizing that TLD is a good suspect on his own for defending GE, the first day's bandwagon, and general scummy comments. Part of it is that Believer, like others, has a case against him for this and Believer did say he was suspicious of TLD before.

Who? What case?

Seriously, Earthling 'feels' different this game.

And, just to add 'saving myself' to my scummy actions: unvote, vote: glyphz

[johnhughthom]

You could tie Fluffy to the lead instead.

You may notice our previous posts were at the same time. I know you think I'm awesome, I didn't realise you believed me to have psychic powers.

unvote, Vote: fluffy

How can I resist such a flattering assumption of mine.

[johnhughthom]

Woah, maybe you're right Roman. Another crosspost kept the tie...

[TheLastDays]

So we have a four way tie now?

Are you sure you want fluffy lynched Romanic?

[Romanic]

So we have a four way tie now?

Are you sure you want fluffy lynched Romanic?

Yes it's a 4 way tie at 3 votes, and what kind of question is the 2nd one?

[Earthling]

The tie isn't going to last with that many people though, so no big deal. glyphz and Double A both have yet to vote and obviously they at least would want to get themselves out of a tie, but even beyond that they the even better chance to vote for someone legitimately scummy and get rid of you.

[TheLastDays]

Sure, go ahead and get rid of me, scum. It's better for you.

[TheLastDays]

Yes it's a 4 way tie at 3 votes, and what kind of question is the 2nd one?

The question is if you'd rather have fluffy lynched then, i.e. glyphz where there is an actual case. Or AA. Or me, for that matter.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Alright, I'll hop aboard the Fluffy bandwagon. If he's still around in the endgame it'll be an impossible analysis.

Vote: Fluffy

[Romanic]

The question is if you'd rather have fluffy lynched then, i.e. glyphz where there is an actual case. Or AA. Or me, for that matter.

I'd rather have Fluffy lynched than you, for sure. You and Believer are likely two Townies lashing at each other, as it's usually the case for similar situations. None of you have a good argument against the other (imo) and what was said in private, but not quoted, discussion is hardly significant to me. I've seen how ATPG can distort my sentences when he's Town, in the last game.

glyphz's case is thin, and I'm waiting for him to react, before saying why I disagree. Not going to give him ammo when, if he's scum, he could trip and give himself away with a scummy reply.

As for Double A, bah - the case is built on a choice of words. I could probably pressure Double A as I'm doing with Fluffy, both being spammers.

[TheLastDays]

Alright, unvote, vote: fluffy

[Zack]

vote: Fluffy

It's a serious vote. Memes are fun but not helpful, and Fluffy choose not to contribute differently so I'm happy to force a claim out of him, or even lynch him.

This is the second day in a row you're trying to get fluffy lynched based on an extremely flimsy, silly case.

Why aren't you trying to search for scum, Romanic? Do you really think fluffy is scum? If not, don't vote for him.

Vote: Romanic

As for fluffy, it would be nice if you actually contribute for once. Romanic has a valid point in that regard. No offense, but posting nothing but memes isn't particularly helpful.

[Zack]

Who? What case?

Seriously, Earthling 'feels' different this game.

And, just to add 'saving myself' to my scummy actions: unvote, vote: glyphz

Alright, unvote, vote: fluffy

Are you just going to jump on every bandwagon that comes up?

Vote for whom you suspect. Jumping on bandwagons to "save yourself" is pointless this early in the Day.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Why aren't you trying to search for scum, Romanic? Do you really think fluffy is scum? If not, don't vote for him.

No, it's not searching for scum, but it doesn't make the case any less valid. Think of the Fluffy lynch as clearing away underbrush with a machete before ultimately walking the trail.

[Riedquat]

^^First the Fluffys and then the lurkers...

Vote: TLD for his general scumminess, nothing specific to address...

[White_eyes:D]

Nice text wall there guys but I think Earthling has it right with a "He/She said argument" all in all.

My spirit would be broken if glyphz was mafia for the fourth time and I didn't follow up at all.

Vote:glyphz

Isn't Fluffy going to post more, not less if we lynch him GH?

[GeneralHankerchief]

Well yeah, probably, but they won't have any effect and we won't need to keep them in mind when it comes down to the end.

[Zack]

No, it's not searching for scum, but it doesn't make the case any less valid. Think of the Fluffy lynch as clearing away underbrush with a machete before ultimately walking the trail.

The lynch is the town's best weapon. It's the only way for the town as a whole to actively try and kill scumbags and it's the most effective way. Lynches shouldn't EVER be wasted for something as silly as "clearing away underbrush."

Why do you think mafia are always so eager to lynch lurkers? Because it's an easy way to distract the town from lynching the actual mafia, and nothing gets accomplished! And the mafia don't have to pretend like they're searching for scum, or build cases, or anything like that. Lynching lurkers is easy, and it's largely unproductive. That's why mafia love it.

The fluffy bandwagon today is a mafioso's dream. It's not searching for scum, but merely eliminating someone perceived to be distracting and annoying.

FoS: Everyone on the fluffywagon.

[Yaropolk]

3 TheLastDays (DIY, Believer, Earthling)
3 Double A (Andres, Capt Blackadder, DE)
3 glyphz (Renata, dcmort, W_e)
5 Fluffy (Chaotix, Romanic, jh, GH, TLD)
1 ATPG (Yaropolk)
1 Romanic (zack)
1 TLD (Riedquat)

Too many votes on Fluffy, can someone switch to glyphz.

Edit: I almost forgot my tribute to Athena:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[TheLastDays]

We might have won Mafia X had we dealt with lurkers more consequently.

[Double A]

Why would a player with no ability send in orders and then appear in the write-up?

Ask TwilightBlade. It was a joke about him, after all.

Vote double A

All that maybe and possibly make me think that is a mafia trying to appear town when in fact he has p.i.s. Most likely is the one that screams for me since when he is proven correct in his ideas he can say he told us all

If I was mafia trying to appear as town I'd sit on my hands and vote randomly like I usually do. Whenever I actually try to play the game, all I get is a vote or three. It's a wonder I'm trying at all.

1)

2) If this game is going to be decided by some pro-town network that discusses things in private and decides the game by voting in block, then it will be very boring for those not included in the pro-town network.

3) Pro-town networks haven't helped town much in previous games.

4) Pro-town networks get infiltrated all the time.

5) Pro-town network = BORING.

Double A is more interesting.

1-5 is exactly what I'd expect of Andres, but really, why so much interest on me?

Thank God I am still alive !

Fluffy but more discreet. I'm real surprised no one actually quoted this before, due to Warman's penchant for hiding in plain sight.

vote: Fluffy

It's a serious vote. Memes are fun but not helpful, and Fluffy choose not to contribute differently so I'm happy to force a claim out of him, or even lynch him.

Speaking out of experience, I'm inclined to agree. vote: Fluffy

I'd rather have Fluffy lynched than you, for sure. You and Believer are likely two Townies lashing at each other, as it's usually the case for similar situations. None of you have a good argument against the other (imo) and what was said in private, but not quoted, discussion is hardly significant to me. I've seen how ATPG can distort my sentences when he's Town, in the last game.

glyphz's case is thin, and I'm waiting for him to react, before saying why I disagree. Not going to give him ammo when, if he's scum, he could trip and give himself away with a scummy reply.

As for Double A, bah - the case is built on a choice of words. I could probably pressure Double A as I'm doing with Fluffy, both being spammers.

A thin case is slightly better than no case (and yes I realize the situational irony). First "case" is just a shouting match going nowhere, so I'm going to wait on glyphz and see what he does before I change my vote.

The main reason I quoted this post is so I can say that I'm actually not going to spam it up like I usually do during this game.

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

Vote:Double A

Meanie .

[Ironside]

Vote: glyphz

nothing major, but his previous posts adds up.

[Double A]

Vote:Double A

Meanie .

Wait, since when did a FoS warrant a OMGUS vote? Wouldn't it be an OMGUS FoS?

[Khazaar]

Reducing spam can´t hurt Vote: Fluffy

[SoulBlade]

vote: Fluffy
Alive fluffiniess is still suspicious.

[Zack]

This makes me angry. Does anyone actually care about catching scum?

[Tratorix]

This makes me angry. Does anyone actually care about catching scum?

I love these "well I don't want to make a case against anyone" lynches. I mean, it's not like anyone is going to try and stop it, so fluffy's an easy target.

[Renata]

I think they're all seduced by Romanic's sexy assertiveness. Plus maybe a mafia or two.

glyphz's case is thin, and I'm waiting for him to react, before saying why I disagree.

You can tell me why; it's my case.