Results 1 to 30 of 1983

Thread: Netherworld III: Final Judgment [Concluded]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Banned ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Castle 2_5_2, Swissland.
    Posts
    0
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Netherworld III: Final Judgment [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by Double A View Post
    Wait, since when did a FoS warrant a OMGUS vote? Wouldn't it be an OMGUS FoS?

    You confuse me.

  2. #2
    still making Bowser jokes Member Roach Kill Champion, Donkey Rocket Champion Double A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Moonwell Pass
    Posts
    4,606
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: Netherworld III: Final Judgment [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by ELITEOFKWARMAN88GINGERBREADMAN View Post
    You confuse me.

  3. #3
    Banned ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Castle 2_5_2, Swissland.
    Posts
    0
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Netherworld III: Final Judgment [In Play]


  4. #4
    Prince of Maldonia Member Toby and Kiki Champion, Goo Slasher Champion, Frogger Champion woad&fangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,884

    Default Re: Netherworld III: Final Judgment [In Play]

    vote: glyphz
    1) I like Renata's case on him at this point.
    2) Metagame vendetta (joking)
    3) I agree with fluffy's well thought out analysis of the harmfulness of text walls in the act of mafia hunting. It would be a shame to waste the most scholarly mind of Babylon.
    Why did the chicken cross the road?

    So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
    but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
    chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli

  5. #5

    Default Re: Netherworld III: Final Judgment [In Play]

    And I'll give you 4) a reason to unvote, which is that you're not likely to succeed at lynching glyphz in fluffy's place. Voting for a second candidate that won't be lynched if fluffy is anyway, and not being clear whether you really want to save fluffy or just get said other guy is not helpful. It does allow for a scum to be on any bandwagon today and go "I told you so" no matter what fluffy is in the end though. If we're going to randomly lynch someone who is probably a townie solely to rouse up better posting then I agree fluffy is the right call for benefitting future town efforts, and I'd unvote and vote fluffy before one of the other two. So it's just not a good reason to condemn someone else only because they are not fluffy. The only way you'd gain traction is if you find some fluffy voters and convince them to unvote and I'm giving another incentive to imagine that still won't work.

    This day has simply been disappointing discussion wise with the ridiculous bandwagons that took off not based on real evidence. Even though I get we couldn't expect anything more revealed new from axeguy or other roles, we've had very little discussion on whether people now believe that GE was a townie or mafia, which should be absolutely huge in deciding people's votes but isn't.

    Of course, we do have enough total people not voting for fluffy that it's a shame the fluffy lynch is winning anyway, but the chances of getting everyone on a decent bandwagon now are slim, and if there was a chance, I'd obviously prefer to go for the still scummy TLD.
    There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me
    Sign was painted, it said private property
    But on the back side it didn't say nothing
    This land was made for you and me

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO