And I'll give you 4) a reason to unvote, which is that you're not likely to succeed at lynching glyphz in fluffy's place. Voting for a second candidate that won't be lynched if fluffy is anyway, and not being clear whether you really want to save fluffy or just get said other guy is not helpful. It does allow for a scum to be on any bandwagon today and go "I told you so" no matter what fluffy is in the end though. If we're going to randomly lynch someone who is probably a townie solely to rouse up better posting then I agree fluffy is the right call for benefitting future town efforts, and I'd unvote and vote fluffy before one of the other two. So it's just not a good reason to condemn someone else only because they are not fluffy. The only way you'd gain traction is if you find some fluffy voters and convince them to unvote and I'm giving another incentive to imagine that still won't work.

This day has simply been disappointing discussion wise with the ridiculous bandwagons that took off not based on real evidence. Even though I get we couldn't expect anything more revealed new from axeguy or other roles, we've had very little discussion on whether people now believe that GE was a townie or mafia, which should be absolutely huge in deciding people's votes but isn't.

Of course, we do have enough total people not voting for fluffy that it's a shame the fluffy lynch is winning anyway, but the chances of getting everyone on a decent bandwagon now are slim, and if there was a chance, I'd obviously prefer to go for the still scummy TLD.