Netherworld III: Final Judgment [Concluded]

**glyphz** · 08-08-2011, 17:14

Originally Posted by Romanic

vote: glyphz

Not convinced by his defense anymore, he's only defending, not trying to find Scum, I'm reading some vague answers that could be left to interpretation and he has not voted yet.

Also if GE was scum, then Renata casting the 2nd vote on GE is good enough to follow her.

Vote: glyphz
should have done this last round. Though I'm still open to switch to another, preferablt TLD, if someone decides to start a late trend.

**glyphz** · 08-08-2011, 17:16

Nah, disregard my last sentence. Even if I lived this phase, I'll probably lynched off next phase. Let my blood appease the masses, though I suggest keeping an eye on 'em

**glyphz** · 08-08-2011, 17:26

I'm not happy at all that none of my attackers have made a comment/discussion of any significance about my defense (and even much in general, shouldn't that say something about how strong the case against me is?), and instead have lurked and kept their silence, particularly Renata.

(is it bec it's a monday?)

I would have simply told the remaining town to check out those who were merely jumping in on her case (& still ask town to do so), but her silence and lack of response as the head of my prosecution is weird in my opinion. Not a fair trial at all. I thought she'd at least try to justify her case further or at least pick apart my defense.

Makes me wonder if she finally got the role she ws looking for back at sign-ups?

**Renata** · 08-08-2011, 19:16

Originally Posted by glyphz

I'm not happy at all that none of my attackers have made a comment/discussion of any significance about my defense (and even much in general, shouldn't that say something about how strong the case against me is?), and instead have lurked and kept their silence, particularly Renata.

(is it bec it's a monday?)

I would have simply told the remaining town to check out those who were merely jumping in on her case (& still ask town to do so), but her silence and lack of response as the head of my prosecution is weird in my opinion. Not a fair trial at all. I thought she'd at least try to justify her case further or at least pick apart my defense.

Makes me wonder if she finally got the role she ws looking for back at sign-ups?

Charming.

**glyphz** · 08-08-2011, 19:18

Originally Posted by Renata

Charming.

Care to add your piece to this discussion?

I mean... since you decide to pop up & all, post-day...

**Earthling** · 08-08-2011, 19:28

Renata is clearly acting like a neutral, in that she is only cares about her own survival, not really willing to risk anything to benefit the town. She's not exactly been anti-town, I certainly grant that, but is just avoiding any spotlight and happy to have any someone die who is not her. That's all normal for a neutral, have to survive a while for their goals, though it is possible this is because she thinks she's really important as a town power-role and wants to live really badly. I'd think that's not quite the best way to go about it here but she might still want to appear like a neutral to throw off the scum anyway then.

So glyphz if there is anyone you ought to question it's the later bandwagoners who followed for no reason. However I just don't think we'll see the same situation tomorrow anyway so it's not the primary thing to worry about tonight. As one exception Believer seems to have forgotten his vote was actually on you, I wouldn't even worry about him tomorrow.

**glyphz** · 08-08-2011, 19:38

Originally Posted by Earthling

Renata is clearly acting like a neutral, in that she is only cares about her own survival, not really willing to risk anything to benefit the town. She's not exactly been anti-town, I certainly grant that, but is just avoiding any spotlight and happy to have any someone die who is not her. That's all normal for a neutral, have to survive a while for their goals, though it is possible this is because she thinks she's really important as a town power-role and wants to live really badly. I'd think that's not quite the best way to go about it here but she might still want to appear like a neutral to throw off the scum anyway then.

So glyphz if there is anyone you ought to question it's the later bandwagoners who followed for no reason. However I just don't think we'll see the same situation tomorrow anyway so it's not the primary thing to worry about tonight. As one exception Believer seems to have forgotten his vote was actually on you, I wouldn't even worry about him tomorrow.

I do still think that the focus should be on the bandwagoners (where my suspicions lies to begin w/). The only reason I placed Renata on the spotlight, is because her silence (+ mere revote on me )all the way to the end of this phase did not sit well w/ me, and raised a red flag.

edited

**TheLastDays** · 08-08-2011, 19:55

Originally Posted by Earthling

Renata is clearly acting like a neutral, in that she is only cares about her own survival, not really willing to risk anything to benefit the town. She's not exactly been anti-town, I certainly grant that, but is just avoiding any spotlight and happy to have any someone die who is not her. That's all normal for a neutral, have to survive a while for their goals, though it is possible this is because she thinks she's really important as a town power-role and wants to live really badly. I'd think that's not quite the best way to go about it here but she might still want to appear like a neutral to throw off the scum anyway then.

So glyphz if there is anyone you ought to question it's the later bandwagoners who followed for no reason. However I just don't think we'll see the same situation tomorrow anyway so it's not the primary thing to worry about tonight. As one exception Believer seems to have forgotten his vote was actually on you, I wouldn't even worry about him tomorrow.

And if there's even the remote possibility that this might be the case, why are you talking about it where the scum can read about it? You are the one who doesn't make a townie effort this game and you are the one who is off.

Both you and Seon are playing weird. Seon was more active than usual in the beginning but his votes were on easy targets and he was basing cases off of shoddy reasoning and once he starts receiving just the slightest bit of suspicion over it he disappears to his usual lurking.

You are not as you usually are, Mr. Earthling. You are better than this usually, annoying, yes, but your arguments are usually better and your reasoning is even worse this game. Plus, you're not making an effort in looking for scum, you buy into weak cases and follow up on them. You reprimend (sp?) Renata on not taking risks for the town effort yet you want to lynch me for doing exactly that.

FoS: Seon
Fos: Earthling

**Renata** · 08-08-2011, 19:32

I always have participation problems on weekends, and when I did check in briefly earlier this morning, my impression was that the deadline had passed already and you were being lynched.

I think your dredging up my pre-game wish to be mafia says more about you than about me.

You know very well there is no strong "case" against you. There's my feeling that your statement about God Emperor was wrongly phrased (which still persists; I saw your objection yesterday but couldn't get to it), and that's about it. But you were still saved yesterday on the basis of an even weaker case. Today you survive again. And the best you could think to do when that seemed like it might not happen is chuck some mud on me on the basis of participation? I don't think so.