Netherworld III: Final Judgment [Concluded]

**Andres** · 08-08-2011, 21:27

Why exactly was Pizza lynched?

And why is glyphz under pressure?

And why are Double A and Zack flying under the radar so easily?

**Askthepizzaguy** · 08-08-2011, 21:29

I believe I was lynched because I wasn't cluttering up the thread with pages-long cases on anyone, which I usually reserve for the endgame anyway.

In other words, no real reason, just random lynch choice.

**johnhughthom** · 08-08-2011, 21:32

Originally Posted by Andres

Why exactly was Pizza lynched?

Pretty much my fault for tying the vote to provoke a reaction. Why he was in a position to be tied (

not like that, that's khaan's job), I don't know.

**Andres** · 08-08-2011, 21:34

Originally Posted by johnhughthom

Pretty much my fault for tying the vote to provoke a reaction. Why he was in a position to be tied (

not like that, that's khaan's job), I don't know.

What's your opinion on Double A and Zack?

**ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88** · 08-08-2011, 21:36

Originally Posted by Zack

Warman should automatically be nightkilled Night 1 until he changes his name to something shorter.

Sure, why not.

Originally Posted by Askthepizzaguy

*Shrug* You've admitted to me in private that you play games to get revenge on me. You just admitted today that you voted for me for explicitly the purposes of revenge. Warman only plays games for revenge. Warman denies that is the case, after admitting that is the case.

Dude, problem is on your end. Problem should actually be plural, but let's stick to the one I'm talking about.

Anyway, don't bother talking to me. I've deleted your private message. Keep it up, and I'll make sure I don't get any more of them.

Wish is your, my command.

**johnhughthom** · 08-08-2011, 21:41

Originally Posted by Andres

What's your opinion on Double A and Zack?

Sigh...

Okay Double A:

Originally Posted by Double A

If I was mafia trying to appear as town I'd sit on my hands and vote randomly like I usually do.

According to Askthepizzaguy mafia 101 this post makes him scum.

That's about 5 games worth of analysis right there by my usual standards. Zack's been chatty without much substance recently. 8 games.

**Andres** · 08-08-2011, 21:48

Hmmm...

I'm confident that one day, you'll be posting pages long analysis. In 2049 or so

**GeneralHankerchief** · 08-08-2011, 22:13

Please keep all out-of-game issues out of game.

Seriously guys, I've spent more time moderating this game than actually playing it. Can we maybe turn it around for the second half?

**Double A** · 08-08-2011, 22:53

Originally Posted by Earthling

unvote; vote ATPG

Oh, look, a last minute vote switch which resulted in the tie being broken. Totally not incriminating of both glyphz and Earthling.

Originally Posted by johnhughthom

Sigh...

Okay Double A:

According to Askthepizzaguy mafia 101 this post makes him scum.

That's about 5 games worth of analysis right there by my usual standards. Zack's been chatty without much substance recently. 8 games.

Yeah, I kinda figured that would happen shortly after I posted it.

All I have to say is sorry for using logic :/

**johnhughthom** · 08-08-2011, 23:12

Originally Posted by Andres

Hmmm...

I'm confident that one day, you'll be posting pages long analysis. In 2049 or so

I do try, I've even managed to bring up all of a persons posts at once, though it was only 3 posts. I'm hoping to graduate to analysing voting patterns sometime in the next decade. After that who knows?

**Death is yonder** · 08-09-2011, 02:48

I don't understand what you're getting at completely. My vote for you was certainly a joke since I switched it as soon as I said something serious and your case was "Hello". Believe it or not.
Your "case" is based off the assumption that I was trying to imply something with my vote on you and the statement "let me think, which I didn't.

glypz isn't scummy enough for you? Vote Seon then.

No, the crux of my case is that you suppose that GE wasn't scum but there are quite a few compelling reasons listed there why GE was probably scum.

In fact you still haven't provided any reasoning as to why in the face of such a situation (those reasons) you would nevertheless think GE is not scum, hence I believe that you tried to defend your scum partner, and now are trying to back off from it because he got lynched and fallout was definitely inevitable.

And please do not quote: (as a supposed example which explains it all)

GE's claims received some more credibility and at the moment I rather have him down as a townie who did a very dumb move with keeping back his information. I might be a bit biased, because I defended him on Day 1 but I think the scums have just switched who does the killing.

Because while the second occurrence of the Axe Guy raised the possibility of night kill failures, but it proved nothing in relation to innocence or guilt, because as I raised up sometime shortly after the night kill write up:

Even if Night Kill % was the reason behind his failings, this did NOT give GE's claims more credibility, but rather brought up a question that if such was the case, wouldn't GE as scum have a even higher chance of surviving it? (Assuming of course that axe guy is a third party)

Fact is, he claimed to be hesitant to revealing, then backtracked and claimed basic townie. I'd love for you to explain how all this means that GE was a silly townie rather than a panicked scumbag who was seeing whether a soft claim could get him out of it. (Why not right? In Midgard III, "what if we hit a power role?" was a primary concern that averted quite a few lynches of possible power roles.) Tincow even used it to ride out suspicion for quite a while as Jotun, where after a fairly incriminating reveal was imminent, he played this exact card and managed to lie low)