Netherworld III: Final Judgment [Concluded]

[johnhughthom]

Why exactly was Pizza lynched?

Pretty much my fault for tying the vote to provoke a reaction. Why he was in a position to be tied ( not like that, that's khaan's job), I don't know.

[Andres]

Pretty much my fault for tying the vote to provoke a reaction. Why he was in a position to be tied ( not like that, that's khaan's job), I don't know.

What's your opinion on Double A and Zack?

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

Warman should automatically be nightkilled Night 1 until he changes his name to something shorter.

Sure, why not.

*Shrug* You've admitted to me in private that you play games to get revenge on me. You just admitted today that you voted for me for explicitly the purposes of revenge. Warman only plays games for revenge. Warman denies that is the case, after admitting that is the case.

Dude, problem is on your end. Problem should actually be plural, but let's stick to the one I'm talking about.

Anyway, don't bother talking to me. I've deleted your private message. Keep it up, and I'll make sure I don't get any more of them.

Wish is your, my command.

[johnhughthom]

What's your opinion on Double A and Zack?

Sigh...

Okay Double A:

If I was mafia trying to appear as town I'd sit on my hands and vote randomly like I usually do.

According to Askthepizzaguy mafia 101 this post makes him scum.

That's about 5 games worth of analysis right there by my usual standards. Zack's been chatty without much substance recently. 8 games.

[Andres]

Hmmm...

I'm confident that one day, you'll be posting pages long analysis. In 2049 or so

[GeneralHankerchief]

Please keep all out-of-game issues out of game.

Seriously guys, I've spent more time moderating this game than actually playing it. Can we maybe turn it around for the second half?

[Double A]

unvote; vote ATPG

Oh, look, a last minute vote switch which resulted in the tie being broken. Totally not incriminating of both glyphz and Earthling.

Sigh...

Okay Double A:



According to Askthepizzaguy mafia 101 this post makes him scum.

That's about 5 games worth of analysis right there by my usual standards. Zack's been chatty without much substance recently. 8 games.

Yeah, I kinda figured that would happen shortly after I posted it.

All I have to say is sorry for using logic :/

[johnhughthom]

Hmmm...

I'm confident that one day, you'll be posting pages long analysis. In 2049 or so

I do try, I've even managed to bring up all of a persons posts at once, though it was only 3 posts. I'm hoping to graduate to analysing voting patterns sometime in the next decade. After that who knows?

[Death is yonder]

I don't understand what you're getting at completely. My vote for you was certainly a joke since I switched it as soon as I said something serious and your case was "Hello". Believe it or not.
Your "case" is based off the assumption that I was trying to imply something with my vote on you and the statement "let me think, which I didn't.

glypz isn't scummy enough for you? Vote Seon then.

No, the crux of my case is that you suppose that GE wasn't scum but there are quite a few compelling reasons listed there why GE was probably scum.

In fact you still haven't provided any reasoning as to why in the face of such a situation (those reasons) you would nevertheless think GE is not scum, hence I believe that you tried to defend your scum partner, and now are trying to back off from it because he got lynched and fallout was definitely inevitable.

And please do not quote: (as a supposed example which explains it all)

GE's claims received some more credibility and at the moment I rather have him down as a townie who did a very dumb move with keeping back his information. I might be a bit biased, because I defended him on Day 1 but I think the scums have just switched who does the killing.

Because while the second occurrence of the Axe Guy raised the possibility of night kill failures, but it proved nothing in relation to innocence or guilt, because as I raised up sometime shortly after the night kill write up:

Even if Night Kill % was the reason behind his failings, this did NOT give GE's claims more credibility, but rather brought up a question that if such was the case, wouldn't GE as scum have a even higher chance of surviving it? (Assuming of course that axe guy is a third party)

Fact is, he claimed to be hesitant to revealing, then backtracked and claimed basic townie. I'd love for you to explain how all this means that GE was a silly townie rather than a panicked scumbag who was seeing whether a soft claim could get him out of it. (Why not right? In Midgard III, "what if we hit a power role?" was a primary concern that averted quite a few lynches of possible power roles.) Tincow even used it to ride out suspicion for quite a while as Jotun, where after a fairly incriminating reveal was imminent, he played this exact card and managed to lie low)

[woad&fangs]

If I had gotten a mafia pm I would be convinced by this point that this game is a rehash of The Golden Rule
I say we keep things simple and lynch anyone who we know is not vanilla town. That is the case against TLD, right? Or is that the case on Earthling...or Glyphz? Maybe I will have to go back and read those text walls....

[TheLastDays]

No, the crux of my case is that you suppose that GE wasn't scum but there are quite a few compelling reasons listed there why GE was probably scum.

In fact you still haven't provided any reasoning as to why in the face of such a situation (those reasons) you would nevertheless think GE is not scum, hence I believe that you tried to defend your scum partner, and now are trying to back off from it because he got lynched and fallout was definitely inevitable.

And please do not quote: (as a supposed example which explains it all)



Because while the second occurrence of the Axe Guy raised the possibility of night kill failures, but it proved nothing in relation to innocence or guilt, because as I raised up sometime shortly after the night kill write up:

Even if Night Kill % was the reason behind his failings, this did NOT give GE's claims more credibility, but rather brought up a question that if such was the case, wouldn't GE as scum have a even higher chance of surviving it? (Assuming of course that axe guy is a third party)

Fact is, he claimed to be hesitant to revealing, then backtracked and claimed basic townie. I'd love for you to explain how all this means that GE was a silly townie rather than a panicked scumbag who was seeing whether a soft claim could get him out of it. (Why not right? In Midgard III, "what if we hit a power role?" was a primary concern that averted quite a few lynches of possible power roles.) Tincow even used it to ride out suspicion for quite a while as Jotun, where after a fairly incriminating reveal was imminent, he played this exact card and managed to lie low)

It's all just idle theorizing when it comes to GE because he's dead anyway. I don't wee the reason why I would have to make sure everyone believes he was town when I am scum. I can make mistakes and if GE was scum I made one in regards to him. I said the second failed kill attempt by axe guy gave credibility to GE's claims that his survival had nothing to do with a power he had himself. I see that it doesn't clear him of suspicion and that's fine, he's dead anyway and, as stated wuite a few times already, I try not to listen too much to anyone that has been lynched. I really don't see how you can build a case off the fact that I protected someone on Day 1 and have a gut feeling of them being town. He's dead so we'll see at the end of the game if I was right.

[Andres]

No, the crux of my case is that you suppose that GE wasn't scum but there are quite a few compelling reasons listed there why GE was probably scum.

In fact you still haven't provided any reasoning as to why in the face of such a situation (those reasons) you would nevertheless think GE is not scum, hence I believe that you tried to defend your scum partner, and now are trying to back off from it because he got lynched and fallout was definitely inevitable.

For what it's worth, I didn't think God Emperor was scum either.

Against popular opinion, TLD stated that he believed G_E was innocent and afterwards, he stuck to his guns. That's not scummy behaviour at all; on the contrary. Scum would've probably made a U-turn, attempting to make it somehow believable, go with the flow and hope everybody would forget about it sooner rather than later.

I think you guys are all barking upon the wrong tree here.

Zack and Double A are more suspicous than TLD.

[dcmort93]

How so?

Because he is essentially saying we lynch anyone who claims an ability or night action regardless of what it is.

[dcmort93]

When was the last time anyone heard from Vote Death is Yonder?