The Island [Concluded]

[Memnon]

Can't really follow this at the moment, too much work to do, but after this weekend I should be fine. I'll Vote: Abstain to hopefully stay alive

[Sasaki Kojiro]

KILL ISHMAEL NOW

[Ishmael]

You seem very uptight there Sasaki.

[edse]

Vote: Arjos

[God Emperor]

Why were there two different attacks on Pizza? A serial killer AND mafia?

Scum. Vote: Cahoma.. it's always the scum that makes these kinds of statements

[Arjos]

His reasoning for voting for Beefy earlier was to get rid of the inactives, which seems more like what the mafia wants than the town.

Rubbish, lurkers never helped town...

Vote: Ishmael

[Ishmael]

True, but they never harmed it either. Lynching an inactive is essentially wasting a lynch, unless somebody that has a different take on things wishes to enlighten me.

[Frozen In Ice]

Scum. Vote: Cahoma.. it's always the scum that makes these kinds of statements

One does have to wonder however why there are three seperate encounters in the write-up, especially for the serial killer and mafia attack accounted for.

[ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88]

vote: Earthling

BOOYAKA 8888!!!!

[landlubber]

Scum. Vote: Cahoma.. it's always the scum that makes these kinds of statements

I don't really get your reasoning here. Who's to say that a townie can't think aloud in-thread?

[God Emperor]

One does have to wonder however why there are three seperate encounters in the write-up, especially for the serial killer and mafia attack accounted for.

yes indeed. But there is no way for us atm, as far as I know, to figure out the game setup. And so there is no purpose in addressing these matters at this stage, unless you just wish to appear active. And I think that is often the reason for making such posts.

[God Emperor]

I don't really get your reasoning here. Who's to say that a townie can't think aloud in-thread?

None ofc. There will naturally be townies that do this. I am not claiming to *know* that Cahoma is scum, but that the probability of him being scum, has in my eyes, increased with his post.
edit: sorry for the double post

[Beskar]

VOTE: ISHMAEL

ITS CAPS SO HE IS GUILTY.

[Ishmael]

I'M NOT GUILTY. EARTHLING IS GUILTY.

Does that mean you change your vote now?

[Montmorency]

Gasp I've been killed. Oh why didn't I see it coming? In retrospect it was so obvious.

Yes, killed by Mkihail.

Wonder where his partner Dmitri was - ah, I guess I'll give it up.

Vote: Abstain

None of your cases is convincing.

[Skooma Addict]

VOTE: ISHMAEL

ITS CAPS SO HE IS GUILTY.

FLAWLESS REASONING. I SHALL FOLLOW THE SCUM LORD'S EXAMPLE!

VOTE: ISHMAEL

[Xenoneb]

Vote: Visorslash
It's Italic's, so it's more right.

[Earthling]

vote: Tiaexz. Pushing another bandwagon without any great reasons while forgetting completely about your last one?

[Visor]

Vote: Xenoneb

[Insert witty text comment here]

[Xenoneb]

Unvote

[Visor]

[Xenoneb]

Yeah. I just did that. One of you should join my game. The First Triumvirate

[landlubber]

FLAWLESS REASONING. I SHALL FOLLOW THE SCUM LORD'S EXAMPLE!

VOTE: ISHMAEL

What's with the bandwagoning?
Vote:Skooma.

[Xenoneb]

Vote:Skooma
Yeah Bandwagon the bandwagonner!

[Frozen In Ice]

yes indeed. But there is no way for us atm, as far as I know, to figure out the game setup. And so there is no purpose in addressing these matters at this stage, unless you just wish to appear active. And I think that is often the reason for making such posts.

Well actually this is supposed to be a vanilla game, so I would think that we should know everything about the set up. Unless I am missing something.

[Skooma Addict]

What's with the bandwagoning?
Vote:Skooma.

You seem like the corruptible, easily bribed type. If you remove your vote on me, I'll give you a special cookie. It's not in the least bit poisoned either. What do you say?

[Montmorency]

yes indeed. But there is no way for us atm, as far as I know, to figure out the game setup. And so there is no purpose in addressing these matters at this stage, unless you just wish to appear active. And I think that is often the reason for making such posts.

Well actually this is supposed to be a vanilla game, so I would think that we should know everything about the set up. Unless I am missing something.

That is a strange thing to say.

Why did you say it? Unvote; Vote: GodEmperor

[God Emperor]

Well actually this is supposed to be a vanilla game, so I would think that we should know everything about the set up. Unless I am missing something.

Ah yes true. Though you are right that this should be a vanilla game, this clarification does not influence the reason for my vote on Cahoma (which I suppose is still what this concerns)

That is a strange thing to say.

Why did you say it? Unvote; Vote: GodEmperor

I say it because I was asked a question; I answer. I am not sure why you find it strange that I do that. You may elaborate on your question, as I am not sure I get it.
What triggered the vote though Montmorency?

[Montmorency]

Because what you said was false. We have known the game setup from the beginning. Now, this could have been an honest mistake, but then you go on to say this:

there is no purpose in addressing these matters at this stage

Sure there is. That's all we can do.

Why are you misleading people and discouraging writeup analysis?

[God Emperor]

Because what you said was false. We have known the game setup from the beginning. Now, this could have been an honest mistake, but then you go on to say this:



Sure there is. That's all we can do.

Why are you misleading people and discouraging writeup analysis?

right: As far as I understand then we are dealing with a vanilla game. I did forget that when I first posted, because there seemed to be 3 attacks this night. This is what Cahoma comments on. I have no intentions on discouraging writeup analysis, so that has not been on purpose. I do however not see the purpose of analysing on something that can not get us any closer to anything at this point. As far as I see then we have observed 3 attackers and that's it. We need more samples to understand the nature of these attacks. That is what I mean when I say that there is no point in addressing this.

(please correct me on this if my understanding of the game concept is wrong)

edit: it hits me that I never got around reading the first night phase writeup. Not that it is that important, as this discussion is a bit off the road I think (if it continues that is, a need for clarification is always fine :) )