Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

    As you all know in M2TW the diplomacy is much more detailed than RTW, so I wanted to make a list with all the known factions for EBII and put together all infos about diplomatic stances...
    For example in 273 BC the Romani agreed to friendly terms with Ptolemaios II, something iirc wasn't present in EB (and btw why? :D)...

    These are the ingame "factors", don't know how they will be renamed in EBII, but the scale should be the same:

    Reputation:
    Despicable
    Deceitful
    Very untrustworthy
    Untrustworthy
    Dubious
    Mixed
    Reliable
    Very Reliable
    Trustworthy
    Very Trustworthy
    Immaculate

    Relations:
    Abysmal
    Terrible
    Very poor
    Poor
    So-so
    Reasonable
    Amiable
    Good
    Very Good
    Outstanding
    Perfect

    Arche Seleukeia: dubious
    Aruernoi: mixed
    Baktria: mixed
    Boii: dubious
    Bosphoros: reliable
    Epeiros: untrustworthy
    Getai: reliable
    Haedui: mixed
    Hayasdan: reliable
    Karthadastim: dubious
    Koinon Hellenon: untrustworthy
    Lugiones: mixed
    Lusotannan: reliable
    Makedonia: dubious
    Massylim: mixed
    Pahlava: mixed
    Pergamon: dubious
    Pontos: mixed
    Pritanoi: mixed
    Ptolemaioi: dubious
    Romani: dubious
    Saba: mixed
    Saka: mixed
    Sauromatae: mixed
    Sweboz: mixed
    Taksashila: mixed
    Eleutheroi: mixed

    Alliances:

    Arche Seleukeia-Baktria/Pahlava (satraps): reasonable
    Arche Seleukeia-Hayasdan: so-so
    Arche Seleukeia-Makedonia: amiable
    Arche Seleukeia-Pergamon: reasonable
    Arche Seleukeia-Pontos: so-so

    Bosphoros-Koinon Hellenon: very good

    Hayasdan-Baktria/Pahlava/Pontos: reasonable

    Karthadastim-Lusotannan: reasonable
    Karthadastim-Massylim (protectorate): poor
    Karthadastim-Ptolemaioi: reasonable
    Karthadastim-Romani: reasonable

    Koinon Hellenon-Ptolemaioi: reasonable

    Romani-Ptolemaioi: reasonable

    Wars:

    Arche Seleukeia-Ptolemaioi: terrible
    Arche Seleukeia-Saka: very poor

    Baktria-Saka: poor

    Bosphoros-Sauromatae: very poor

    Epeiros-Makedonia: terrible
    Epeiros-Romani: terrible
    Epeiros-Karthadastim: terrible

    Hayasdan-Sauromatae: very poor

    Koinon Hellenon-Makedonia: terrible

    Pahlava-Saka: poor

    Pontos-Ptolemaioi: very poor

    Neutrals:

    Every enemy's allies to poor, all the rest to reasonable, with these exceptions:

    Aruernoi-Haedui: so-so
    Boii-Romani: so-so
    Getai-Makedonia: so-so
    Makedonia-Sauromatae: so-so

    Anyone wanna add something else or change anything?

    Hope this can be of any help :)
    Last edited by Arjos; 08-27-2011 at 19:47. Reason: adding suggestions

  2. #2
    mostly harmless Member B-Wing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    on the Streets of Rage!
    Posts
    1,070

    Default Re: Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

    I got no suggestions to offer, but I think this is a pretty sweet endeavor on your part and I'm impressed. Everytime I see something like this it makes me start having EB withdrawals.

    I do have a related question, though, if it's appropriate to ask here. Classical history is not my strong point, but I always thought it was strange that the Roman Republic and the Empire of Carthage start the game as allies. I guess that's because the series of Punic Wars are so famous. But I was wondering how this affects the gameplay of EB2. In EB1, I never saw Rome and Carthage break their alliance, much less go to war. I'm wondering if the starting alliance state effectively prevents the AI from allowing epic warfare between the two to break out.

    I understand, of course, that EB is not intended to be history on rails. But I think we'd all agree that seeing the Punic War emerge in most campaigns is an enjoyable thing, even when you're not playing as either of the two factions involved. Perhaps if Carthage and Rome began as allies, but with significantly poorer relations, they would be more likely to go to war at some point?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

    I think Epeiros should be lower Rep since Pyrrhos' mercenaries looted Aigai.
    [COLOR="Black"]Jesus's real name was Inuyasha Yashua!
    Any computer made after 1985 has the storage capacity to house an evil spirit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluvius Camillus View Post
    What I'm showing here is that it doesn't matter how well trained or brave you are, no one can resist an elephant charge in the rear

    ~Fluvius

  4. #4
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

    Quote Originally Posted by B_Ray View Post
    Perhaps if Carthage and Rome began as allies, but with significantly poorer relations, they would be more likely to go to war at some point?
    I think that was due to the nonexistent naval invasions in EB, in my games once Rome gained control of Sicily it was all over, or the two factions got separated by the Eleutheroi or Epeiros...

    Quote Originally Posted by Olaf The Great View Post
    I think Epeiros should be lower Rep since Pyrrhos' mercenaries looted Aigai.
    Good point, also Pyrrhos managed to be hated pretty much by the whole greek world...
    Last edited by Arjos; 08-27-2011 at 19:56.

  5. #5
    Member Member stratigos vasilios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    New Holland
    Posts
    1,163

    Default Re: Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

    Add another to the list:

    The Faction of Arjos
    Reputation: Despicable
    Relations: Abysmal
    At war with all players at start of game

    We love you because you died and resurrected to save us...
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    We love you Goku!




  6. #6
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: Discussion thread for diplomatic relations and reputations...

    You meanie! :D

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO