Auto Manage vs Manage All Settlements

**Sp4** · 08-30-2011, 18:37

I always thought that turning on the 'Auto Manage' option when starting your campaign is fairly pointless, because why let the AI manage settlements without gouvernors if I can do it myself?

Is there a catch to it? I see some people leave it on anyways?

**archimedez** · 08-31-2011, 16:25

As the quequed buildings do not cost any money in advance, there is not much point in auto manage.
You can queque up tasks for 10-20 rounds and focus on the fighting.

**Dacian** · 10-19-2011, 17:14

Yes , but only fighting is pretty boring. Managing you empire is great , especially if you play with your homeland faction ;)

**A Nerd** · 10-21-2011, 02:05

I never auto manage. Half the fun of the game, for me anyway, is to manage my settlements and provide an income for my military machines and future conquest.

**Alrik** · 10-27-2011, 10:24

I pretty much agree with everyone as well, I wouldn't play a stratergy game if I didn't like the stratergy points and auto manage is just down to damn luck. Pretty much the reason I hate naval warfare, because it's like auto relolve battles, no stratergy at all and a lot of luck. If I wanted to roll dice I'd play risk.