Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 66 of 66

Thread: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

  1. #61

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    Quote Originally Posted by vartan View Post

    Yeah. I think Rome or perhaps only post-Marian Rome needs a high merc count.
    Oh yeah completely agree; it should be mainly post-Marian Rome.

    PS. I think a better way to explain my previous post is to say everyone is bringing their own idea/suggestion of what should be done with Rome, so the suggestions become mixed, garbled and confusing. I think a good way of separating suggestions is to look to its author.
    "Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam."

  2. #62
    EB:NOM Triumvir Member gamegeek2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hanover, NH
    Posts
    3,569

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    The Sweboz are the ones that used dense shield-wall formations; they will get high mass then. The Gauls, I think, would use a looser order, especially with their long swords.
    Europa Barbarorum: Novus Ordo Mundi - Mod Leader Europa Barbarorum - Team Member

    Quote Originally Posted by skullheadhq
    Run Hax! For slave master gamegeek has arrived
    "To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a desert and call it peace." -Calgacus

  3. #63
    Involuntary Gaesatae Member The Celtic Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In the heart of Hyperborea
    Posts
    2,962

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    I would argue for the shieldwall thing for certain Celtic units as well, perhaps most obviously the Mori Gaesum and Appea Gaedotos, but Arjos and Milnaht can also be considered (their descriptions say "they fought well in phalanx" and "used a shield wall like formation" respectively).

  4. #64
    EB:NOM Triumvir Member gamegeek2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hanover, NH
    Posts
    3,569

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    Quote Originally Posted by The Celtic Viking View Post
    I would argue for the shieldwall thing for certain Celtic units as well, perhaps most obviously the Mori Gaesum and Appea Gaedotos, but Arjos and Milnaht can also be considered (their descriptions say "they fought well in phalanx" and "used a shield wall like formation" respectively).
    Those too, as well. It would just be a thing much more common to Germanic units.
    Europa Barbarorum: Novus Ordo Mundi - Mod Leader Europa Barbarorum - Team Member

    Quote Originally Posted by skullheadhq
    Run Hax! For slave master gamegeek has arrived
    "To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a desert and call it peace." -Calgacus

  5. #65
    RABO! Member Brave Brave Sir Robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Assaulting your flanks
    Posts
    1,475

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    Would it make sense, since infantry charges are bugged, to increase mass for units that historically were ferocious chargers instead of bothering with the charge bonus which means essentially nothing for infantry?

    Also, do units lose pushing power as their stamina decreases?
    From Frontline for fixing siege towers of death
    x30 From mikepettytw for showing how to edit in game text.
    From Brennus for wit.

  6. #66
    EB:NOM Triumvir Member gamegeek2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hanover, NH
    Posts
    3,569

    Default Re: [EB] Thoughts on balancing Rome in a historical way

    Quote Originally Posted by Brave Brave Sir Robin View Post
    Would it make sense, since infantry charges are bugged, to increase mass for units that historically were ferocious chargers instead of bothering with the charge bonus which means essentially nothing for infantry?

    Also, do units lose pushing power as their stamina decreases?
    Not sure about your second question, but for the first, that's a good idea especially as we don't want those low-defense, unarmored barbarian units to fold too easily to charging cavalry.
    Europa Barbarorum: Novus Ordo Mundi - Mod Leader Europa Barbarorum - Team Member

    Quote Originally Posted by skullheadhq
    Run Hax! For slave master gamegeek has arrived
    "To robbery, slaughter, plunder, they give the lying name of empire; they make a desert and call it peace." -Calgacus

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO