Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Vanilla multiplayer experiences?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    ridiculously suspicious Member TheLastDays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Right behind you.
    Posts
    2,116

    Default Re: Vanilla multiplayer experiences?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lazy O View Post
    Gaul and Spain are universally accepted spectator factions which are good for nothing. Germania is a hard counter to rome. Picking egypt is frowned upon. An other chariot factions are balanced against Carthage/Brittania/Greece. Rome mega fails against any faction besides carthage/numidia/macedon(this matchup is balanced)/greece/spain/gaul/thrace/dacia.
    I have never played Multiplayer and I have little interest in doing so but you just perfectly described an imbalanced game. A game where certain, limited matchups are somewhat fair for both sides cannot be called balanced. If you let a twenty-two year old bodybuilder wrestle against a six year old, the six year old might have a chance if you drug the bodyuilder with a lot of narcotics, tie his hands behind his back and give the six year old a gun but that doesn't make fights between adults and children generally balanced.
    I hear the voice of the watchmen!

    New Mafia Game: Hunt for The Fox

  2. #2

    Default Re: Vanilla multiplayer experiences?

    It's been a while, but Vanilla multiplayer would, in most cases, give me the win on a silver platter when I played Rome. I would play EB online right now, If it weren't for the fact that my Rome disc is lost . I miss those battles (but I remember that I never won many on EB).

    'Let no man be called happy before his death. Till then, he is not happy, only lucky." -Solon


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO