'Helping' stupid criminals

[Montmorency]

Great red herring. It is a terrible argument and shouldn't be considered, period. The way you presented it had you contradicting yourself and there is a term for those that don't obey moral rules, they are called sociopaths.

They do obey moral rules. Just not yours.

[a completely inoffensive name]

They do obey moral rules. Just not yours.

Ehhh. Don't feel like getting into that kind of a discussion right now. Pretty sure though definition of "sociopath" is someone who has no moral compass at all.

[Montmorency]

There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

(1) failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
(2) deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
(3) impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
(4) irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
(5) reckless disregard for safety of self or others
(6) consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
(7) lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

B. The individual is at least age 18 years.

It is not there.

[a completely inoffensive name]

It is not there.

All of those are just characteristics of a lack of right and wrong. It is the term "DGAF" taken to the utmost extreme.

[Seamus Fermanagh]

Eugenics is not a subject that is, or should be, forbidden.
However, it is divisive and the efforts made in this thread so far are less than "objective."

Given the poor start, I believe I will euthanize this thread.