Anyone think that real time battles with a paradox game would be epic?

[Hamata]

I sure think so. and i have all ways kinda wanted to add them in my self if i could i dont know how to code :P

[lars573]

That would require Partadox being able to make a decent game. Which they can't.

[Alexander the Pretty Good]

That would require Partadox being able to make a decent game. Which they can't.

u mad

It would be tough to do it in such a way that didn't make the battles tiresome. In EU3, for instance, you can fight multiple large scale battles in a war in addition to dozens of 1/2 unit stack smashing. The other problem (at least with EU3 and Vicky) would be technological progress. You'd have to build either something very compromised to cover the entire historical range (like Medieval 2) or have multiple engines to cover the different technology levels.

[lars573]

u mad

Nope. Paradox makes crap games.

[Alexander the Pretty Good]

Nope. Paradox makes crap games.

[Slyspy]

There is no accounting for taste.

[Marshall Louis-Nicolas Davout]

No.Avatar the last airbender will do.

[The Wizard]

Nope. Paradox makes crap games.

Mind explaining why you think so? That they're released with many bugs doesn't count, I think. Complaining about that is like complaining about rain falling in Scotland.

[Veho Nex]

I sure think so. and i have all ways kinda wanted to add them in my self if i could i dont know how to code :P

Something on the lines of RUSE by Ubisoft would be kind of cool. Like divisions that you move on a grand campaign map where its on a table in a room, and you can zoom in to each individual unit.

[rajpoot]

Something on the lines of RUSE by Ubisoft would be kind of cool. Like divisions that you move on a grand campaign map where its on a table in a room, and you can zoom in to each individual unit.

Lol, are you needling him?