View Poll Results: Fag:

Voters
20. This poll is closed
  • Allow everybody to write everything they please anytime

    3 15.00%
  • We do not need overmoderation. Fag depending on context.

    14 70.00%
  • We need more Political Correctness. Never allow fag.

    6 30.00%
  • Gah loves to puff on a fag

    4 20.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 30 of 75

Thread: A Question of Context

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Summa Rudis Senior Member Catiline's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Dubai
    Posts
    5,112

    Default A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    We have always allowed the word fag in the manner in which it was used. (In the BR/WT) The question is whether we want to change that.

    No Louis, we haven't.
    Last edited by Secura; 09-28-2011 at 10:22.
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra

  2. #2
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Catiline View Post
    No Louis, we haven't.
    The entire Backroom is full of people making the other out for gay or pretending to be gay themselves. We not only allow it, we daily practise it. Everywhere you look it's gay this, poofter that. ('I bet the he's making Dave's my nipples hard')

    Let's not get carried away here into thinking we are dealing with some sort of singularly unique event. We're talking common daily practise.
    Last edited by Secura; 09-28-2011 at 10:23.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  3. #3
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    The entire Backroom is full of people making the other out for gay or pretending to be gay themselves. We not only allow it, we daily practise it. Everywhere you look it's gay this, poofter that. ('I bet the he's making Dave's my nipples hard')

    Let's not get carried away here into thinking we are dealing with some sort of singularly unique event. We're talking common daily practise.
    No Louis, No.
    Last edited by Secura; 09-28-2011 at 10:22.
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  4. #4
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Beskar View Post
    No Louis, No.


    One need not look further than the very thread we're most closely focused on here. Here's the rundown of the posts not by me:
    Strike is called a transgender.
    Cutewolf is said to have a gender identity crisis.
    Strike is called a slug.
    Lemur is described as a homosexual with certain...'preferences'
    There are risky picture of a naked bear
    Cutewofl is described as 'ambiguous'
    CuteWolf and Hax are said to resemble girls in real life pictures
    Kralizec is called a leather gay bear

    It is common daily Backroom practise to call each other all sorts of gender and orientation based 'slurs'. We have always allowed it. The question is whether we need to change that to take today's sensitivities into closer account.
    Last edited by Secura; 09-28-2011 at 10:22.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  5. #5

    Default Re: A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post


    One need not look further than the very thread we're most closely focused on here. Here's the rundown of the posts not by me:
    Strike is called a transgender.
    Cutewolf is said to have a gender identity crisis.
    Strike is called a slug.
    Lemur is described as a homosexual with certain...'preferences'
    There are risky picture of a naked bear
    Cutewofl is described as 'ambiguous'
    CuteWolf and Hax are said to resemble girls in real life pictures
    Kralizec is called a leather gay bear

    It is common daily Backroom practise to call each other all sorts of gender and orientation based 'slurs'. We have always allowed it. The question is whether we need to change that to take today's sensitivities into closer account.
    There's a difference between "... is a muslim fag" and "... is a leather gay bear".

  6. #6
    Wandering Metsuke Senior Member Zim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,190

    Default Re: A Question of Context

    A few quick thoughts.

    1. What a terribly done poll. Can anyone possibly think it's a good start to a serious discussion, or that the leading poll choices allow for anything like an accurate reading of people's opinions?

    2. Related to the above, why is using the word in the pejorative sense but only joking in the same category as using it as a slang term for cigarette? From the discussion that prompted this it's obvious that the criticism was focused on the former usage.

    3. I imagine both Louis and Andres may be right about pass usage. That is, that the word used in a joking manner may not have been infracted by some backroom mods (either going unnoticed or not seeming severe enough to them) and that more generally the word has not been allowed here.

    If I had been asked before all this came up I would likely have said "no way that could be allowed", and I think that's the way it should be. "I'm joking" is not an excuse for using the word in the pejorative sense.
    Last edited by Zim; 09-28-2011 at 17:55.
    V&V RIP Helmut Becker, Duke of Bavaria.



    Come to the Throne Room for hotseats and TW rpgs!

    Kermit's made a TWS2 guide? Oh, the other frog....

  7. #7
    Mr Self Important Senior Member Beskar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Albion
    Posts
    15,930
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post


    One need not look further than the very thread we're most closely focused on here. Here's the rundown of the posts not by me:
    Strike is called a transgender. Never seen this before, possible referencing to wearing a dress, either way, I don't see 'fag' being thrown around.
    Strike is called a slug. Never seen this before.
    Kralizec is called a leather gay bear Never seen this before.
    Lemur is described as a homosexual with certain...'preferences' Lemur is a happily married man with kids, his homosexuality isn't real neither is being a homosexual a bad thing, but going around calling people fags as it is akin to using the n-word (in reference to darker skin) and not acceptable and in any context, where I have seen Lemur make possible homosexual references, he has always done so respectfully.
    There are risky picture of a naked bear ???
    Cutewolf is said to have a gender identity crisis. This may be a fact
    Cutewofl is described as 'ambiguous' This is a fact, but being called 'ambiguous' is not the same as calling him a 'fag'.
    CuteWolf and Hax are said to resemble girls in real life pictures They do, but still calling them 'fags' would be unacceptable and there is nothing wrong with their feminine choices.

    It is common daily Backroom practise to call each other all sorts of gender and orientation based 'slurs'. We have always allowed it. The question is whether we need to change that to take today's sensitivities into closer account.
    Only 'gender related' or sexual orientation that occurs if either when Devastation Dave decides to post, or when you and Strike are flooding topics with your fantasy internet homoerotic relationship. Even then, you and Strike doing your fake homosexual relationship isn't the backroom patrons going around calling eachother 'fags'.

    If I said the word 'fags' in the context you used it, I would expect a minimum of a 1 point infraction and nothing less. It is an utter embarrassment to the mod team that you are keeping up this charade. It is bad enough when the Moderators have to handle these sensitive issues without one of their own trolling them in the watchtower.

    Also this prolonged charade is making it worse for you, everytime you try to worm out of it and instead of simply admittedly your error just frustrates people and starts turning that little molehill which was so easy simply to say "Sorry" into something far grander and more serious like questioning your ability as a moderator.
    Last edited by Beskar; 09-28-2011 at 18:31.
    Days since the Apocalypse began
    "We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
    "Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."

  8. #8
    TexMec Senior Member Louis VI the Fat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Saint Antoine
    Posts
    9,935

    Default Re: A Question of Context

    Beskar, I do not feel strongly either way. If people take offense, then they take offense and I shall refrain from such wording. There is no need for me to cause needless offense or disruption.

    It is all rather inconsequential. I think we differ mostly in a sense of emotional investment, urgency in this. It is just not a big deal.
    Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
    Texan by birth, woodpecker by the grace of God
    I would be the voice of your conscience if you had one - Brenus
    Bt why woulf we uy lsn'y Staraft - Fragony
    Not everything
    blue and underlined is a link


  9. #9
    The Abominable Senior Member Hexxagon Champion Monk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    YU-ESS-AY
    Posts
    6,666

    Default Re: A Question of Context

    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat View Post
    It is all rather inconsequential. I think we differ mostly in a sense of emotional investment, urgency in this. It is just not a big deal.
    Then stop.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO