[EB]3v3 or 4v4 Historical Battle Idea

**TheShakAttack** · 10-20-2011, 08:03

Sounds great. Would have to be fairly balanced armies though... Me wanna be Hannibal at Zama and kill Scipio.

**Lazy O** · 10-20-2011, 09:35

Too easy.

I suggest Magnesia.

**Brave Brave Sir Robin** · 10-20-2011, 12:30

Magnesia was actually my first choice as well. You can see I put it first in my list :p

**Lazy O** · 10-20-2011, 12:40

Arent you an early riser. Mind coming on hamachi? we can discuss it in depth.

**TheShakAttack** · 10-20-2011, 16:11

Really? I thought Magnesia is quite unbalanced as per Livy and Appian.

**Brave Brave Sir Robin** · 10-20-2011, 16:17

I don't see how it so unbalanced. Antiochus had a substantially larger force but it was poorly trained and organized in comparison to the experienced Roman force. Obviously we would play around with the estimates of soldiers present but I don't think it would be unbalanced. Poor organization can be handled numerous ways as in giving commanders a variety of units that do not necessarily constitute a proper army and forcing them to integrate in many places at once.

Oh and Lazy, I'm only up so early to study so sorry to disappoint lol