Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
It wasn't? Marathon, Plataea and Thermopylae beg to differ.
Because we all know that battles only consisted of which soldier had the stronger will and the most talent. Commanders, terrain, geopolitics etc...all have nothing to do with it.
I don't recall any Spartan hippeis at Marathon, and at Thermopylae they were far from the only Greeks. At Plataea, all Greeks got to slaughter some Persians.
So you think the hoplites of Athens were untrained before Marathon? Or the other Peloponessians at Thermopylae?
Quo usque tandem abutere, Catilina, patientia nostra
They were largely untrained, yes. Spartans were seen as unique because they had a training program at all.
Incorrect.Spartans had a life long "training program": Agoge, compared to other Greeks being part time citizen soldiers. That does not mean the others would not have trained at all or gotten basic military training.Fighting in formation always needs some amount of cohesion so the force can act together. Most of the history, most men in armies have been levies or conscripts. Full time soldiers mostly only elites.
Last edited by Kagemusha; 10-30-2011 at 17:41.
Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.
Thermopylae wasn't a Greek victory.
Marathon and Plataea indeed were decisive victories, from the Greek point of view. You have to understand that those battles didn't carry the same importance for the Persians and for the Greeks. For Greeks, it was a fight for survival, for Persian it was a punitive expedition against some "barbarians" on the fringes of the empire.
Bookmarks