Quote Originally Posted by rajpoot View Post
That is one point he makes but in the end he also states, (I quote)



It would appear that this was done solely so that the movie could use this new-fangled 3D tech.
Yes, but I interpreted that to mean that it look cheap because you could see all the imperfections. Maybe I was wrong. Either way, I will give the first movie a try. If it is no good, I will just not bother with the second. I wish people would get over the 3-D craze. Honestly, it kind of sucks. The only time I really appreciated 3-D was when I was watching Wrath of the Titans and rocks started falling down toward the camera. I was sitting there dodging them and the people beside me were looking at me like I was crazy. That was pretty cool, but overall I would have like it better without 3-D.