looking at the raw data the brits should win. ill post results in abit.
kluddargos vs rompha = 74 kills for kluddargos and 37 kills for rompha (rompha rout after general is killed)
kluddargos vs rompha = 114 kills for kluddargos vs 116 kills for rompha (kluddargos rout)
kluddargas vs pattya =110 kill for kluddargos vs 102 kills for pattya (pattya rout)
kluddargas vs pattya = 98 kills for kluddargas vs 79 kills for pattya (kluddargas lose general but pattya rout shortly after)
pattya vs kluddargos = 110 kills patty vs 85 for kluddargos (kluddargos rout)
rompha vs pattya = 65 kills for rompha vs 101 kills for pattya (rompha rout after dead general)
rompha vs pattya = 52 kills for rompha vs 99 kills for pattya (rompha rout)
rompha vs pattya = 35 kills for rompha vs 83 kills for pattya (rompha rout after dead general)
this is weird, the rompha have 2 more charge and should be better statistically... i dont understand why the pattya are beating the rompha so hard but are losing vs the kluddargos.
ah i think i know why the pattya are doing so good, they are the least armoured of the 3...
the sreni pattya win it for some strange reason even tho they are statistically the least (least charge which seems very important in this case)
what i have noticed is that the pattya model is the most effective. after the charge both the kluddargos and the rompha do a sort of regrouping and like 20 men go to the back without fighting, the pattya unit doesnt do it and thus uses the men more effectively.
and about the hypaspistai swords, ye that was a mistake. the swords are better but not as much as i had hoped. i tried it a few times and now ive decided to mod out the spears as secundary weapons because its more the constant switching that makes it ineffective than whatever weapon they are using themself.
Bookmarks