Sex-Crazed Co-eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control

[Rhyfelwyr]

This has more to do with women having sex than it ever did with the validity and cost effective measures of the pill. It's a puritanical, knee jerk reaction.

Yeah well that's the kind I specialise in.

If they do want the pill covered by insurance it should only ever be on the health grounds you mentioned.

Your points are valid but this thread is specifically about those who argue they should get the pill for free so they can have recreational sex.

I think that that particular argument will at least be more difficult to defend.

[Strike For The South]

Yeah well that's the kind I specialise in.

If they do want the pill covered by insurance it should only ever be on the health grounds you mentioned.

Your points are valid but this thread is specifically about those who argue they should get the pill for free so they can have recreational sex.

I think that that particular argument will at least be more difficult to defend.

The way the woman framed her arguement was lamentable but on the other side of the coin people lobby for useless crap all the time....this really is no different.

I would also point out the man can cut and run anytime on an unwanted/unplanned pregnancy a woman, one way or another has to deal with the situation and the consequnces. That is also a pertinent point

[a completely inoffensive name]

I think that that particular argument will at least be more difficult to defend.

Not really. This is reality. Human's loooooove to have sex. Teenage brains are not fully developed yet, they are not fully in control. Making a moral decision of preventing birth control to horny teenagers presents us a net harm by causing an increase in abortions.

[Strike For The South]

Not really. This is reality. Human's loooooove to have sex. Teenage brains are not fully developed yet, they are not fully in control. Making a moral decision of preventing birth control to horny teenagers presents us a net harm by causing an increase in abortions.

You don't need to frame the arguement like this for birth control to considerd valid enough to at least partially cover. You don't have to talk about sex at all

[gaelic cowboy]

You don't need to frame the arguement like this for birth control to considerd valid enough to at least partially cover. You don't have to talk about sex at all

Indeed you could make it on economic grounds less babies means women have more ability to work outside the home.

Societies where more women earn a wage are richer by default.

[Strike For The South]

Also something that needs to be mentioned

You take the pill on a schedule. There is no "I'm going to screw the entire football team in hopes we win the big game, so I had better pop 50"

Once again an example of the male disconnect

UGh....I sounded like Gloria Steiniem

I'm going to go take a shower

[Centurion1]

Also something that needs to be mentioned

You take the pill on a schedule. There is no "I'm going to screw the entire football team in hopes we win the big game, so I had better pop 50"

Once again an example of the male disconnect

UGh....I sounded like Gloria Steiniem

I'm going to go take a shower

I think everyone is aware of this I am not sure why it is relevant in the slightest.

[Strike For The South]

I think everyone is aware of this I am not sure why it is relevant in the slightest.

Becuase the girl is being framed as some sort of sluf b/c her birth control costs 3,000$

The assumption being if she needs that much she must be a harlot, which is patently false

[Vladimir]

I don't consider her a slut, just the spokesperson for sluts.

But really, this person should expect to be ridiculed and it's extremely satisfying given that she's being used as a political football. This is like the outrage social conservatives receive. The fact that she's being used as a pawn by a political party I despise makes it more entertaining.

[Vladimir]

Is this what Lemur was talking about:

http://todayonthetrail.today.msnbc.m...unned-outraged

[a completely inoffensive name]

You don't need to frame the arguement like this for birth control to considerd valid enough to at least partially cover. You don't have to talk about sex at all

That's true. I will silence myself for now then.

[Strike For The South]

That's true. I will silence myself for now then.

I'm not saying you have to silence yourself

Y U Mad Tho?

[a completely inoffensive name]

I'm not saying you have to silence yourself

Y U Mad Tho?

I have no more cool clam digging stories to tell people, what else can I talk about?

LOL <3 Super Mad, because I ran out of Muscle Milk today.

[Rhyfelwyr]

I would also point out the man can cut and run anytime on an unwanted/unplanned pregnancy a woman, one way or another has to deal with the situation and the consequnces. That is also a pertinent point

I know its unfair, but for what it is worth I don't think single mothers should ever be demonised, and that both the government and society should support them.

I think everyone is aware of this

I wasn't.

Women are to me a strange and mysterious species and I don't know anything about all their goings on. But I'm still going to give a horrendously male-centric opinion on what I think of their sex life and life decisions.

U mad?

Not really. This is reality. Human's loooooove to have sex. Teenage brains are not fully developed yet, they are not fully in control. Making a moral decision of preventing birth control to horny teenagers presents us a net harm by causing an increase in abortions.

If they are at college they are old enough to know what they are doing. I mean the girl from the OP is like a ho activist, lobbying the entire political system to fund her sex life.