Results 1 to 30 of 445

Thread: A History of Violence [Concluded]

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by Chaotix View Post
    Why aren't you all voting for this guy here?

    I'm not even in the game yet and I can tell he's guilty...
    But I'm always guilty, even when I'm town. So they should exhaust all other avenues first.

    EDIT:

    That made a lot more sense as a joke in my mind... I think... I think I should get some sleep...
    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu
    Thank you for the smile, I like your image a lot. Hopefully you don't feel too much like a number here.

    Rest in peace TosaInu

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Jarema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,455

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Splitpersonality.
    Throwing almost random comments and not going after own thoughts

  3. #3

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Vote: Daveshack

  4. #4

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Thanks to Nightbringer for the early round tally summary, which I shamelessly copied.

    Day 1:
    Monty: 2 (ATPG, Tuuvi)
    ATPG: 1 (split)
    Nightbringer: 1 (Monty)
    White Eyes: 1 (Lazy)
    Lewwyn: 1 (Salmonsoil)
    Split: 1 (Arjos)
    Lazy: 2 (Bsmith, Nightbringer)
    Atheotes: 1 (Riedquat)
    Salmonsoil: 1 (Lewwyn)
    Arjos: 1 (Jarrema)


    Day 2:
    Tally:
    Kage: 1 (ATPG)
    Seon: 2 (Lazy, edse)
    Salmon: 2 (Daveshack, Split)
    Split: 3 (Kagemusha, Jarema, Nightbringer)
    Jarrema: 1 (Riedquat)
    Atheotes: 1 (Arjos)
    Nightbringer: 2 (BSmith, Atheotes)
    ATPG: 1 (Tuuvi)
    Daveshack: 1 (Salmon)


    Day 3:
    White_Eyes:D: 4 (edse, Arjos, atheotes, LazyMcCrow)
    Riedquat: 4 (Seon, SalmonSoil, Jarema, White_Eyes:D)
    Nightbringer: 1 (Riedquat)
    atheotes: 1 (Nightbringer)


    Day 4:
    Nightbringer: 2 (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)
    Kagemusha: 3 (Arjos, Seon, atheotos)


    Day 5:

    Tally:
    Arjos: 2 (Seon, Salmonsoil)
    Seon: 3 (ATPG, Arjos, DaveShack
    Nightbringer: 2 (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)


    Currently:
    Alive 8/17:
    1. SalmonSoil
    2. LazyMcCrow
    4. Arjos
    7. Nightbringer
    8. Jarrema
    9. DaveShack
    12. Askthepizzaguy
    16. BSmith

    Dead 8/17:
    5. Monty: Lynched Day 1
    15. Lewwyn: Killed Night 1
    14. Splitpersonality: Lynched Day 2
    10. Tuuvi: Killed Night 2
    3. Riedquat: Lynched Day 3
    13. White_Eyes:D: Killed Night 3
    11. Kagemusha: Lynched Day 4
    6. Atheotes: Killed Night 4
    17. Seon: Lynched Day 5

    Night 5 -- Nightbringer killed

    Day 6:
    Arjos lynched
    Arjos - Pizza, Jarema, DaveShack
    DaveShack - Arjos
    ATPG - Salmon, Lazy

    Night 6:
    BSMith killed

    Day 7:
    Salmon - ATPG, Lazy
    Lazy - Salmon, DaveShack
    ATPG - Jarema

    Salmon lynched

    Night 7: Lazy killed

    Final analysis:

    Jarema vs Dave+ATPG+Lazy : no win situation
    Dave vs ATPG+Lazy+Jarema : can kill either Lazy or ATPG and Jarema will vote for the other
    ATPG vs Dave+Lazy+Jarema : kill Lazy, Dave certain to vote for Jarema. Kill Jarema, Dave possible vote for Lazy

    Potential buddies: Monty, Split, Riedquat, Kagemusha, Seon, Arjos, Salmon
    ATPG: Y, N, N, N, Y, Y, Y
    Jarema: N, Y, Y, N, N, Y, N
    Dave: N, N, N, N, Y, Y, N

    Salmon:
    ATPG couldn't be bussing Salmon, because lynching Lazy wins the game if two mafia alive
    Jarema could have made a true mistake, and Salmon + Jarema would still be possible.
    I almost changed my vote to him, but almost doesn't count. Could be partner.

    Arjos:
    They both voted for Arjos, and the very first vote in a phase is far too risky. Arjos is not the partner.
    Pizza gets a possible scumtell for leading off the wagon since Arjos seems to be innocent
    Dave 3rd vote, could be a bus but there was an alternative, not likely

    Seon:
    ATPG votes first again. It's a OMGUS and could pass for such.
    Jarema didn't vote, or even post this round from the looks of it.
    Dave voted

    Kagemusha:
    Neither one voted in the round but not likely to be ATPG's partner. Could be Jarema's.
    Dave missed vote, could be partner

    Riedquat:
    Jarema Voted 3rd, but there was a clear alternative in White_eyes:D Not likely to be partner
    ATPG did not vote in the round
    Dave missed vote, could be partner

    Split:
    Jarema voted 2nd, unlikely partner
    ATPG voted for Kagemusha, possible very safe bus depending on where in round -- nope, 1st vote again
    Dave voted with split against Salmon. Unlikely for partners to vote together this early with such low totals.

    Monty:
    ATPG voted first again. Not partner
    Jarema voted for Arjos. Could be partner.
    Dave voted for someone else Could be partner.

    Jarema possible partners: Monty, Kagemusha, Seon, Salmon (if a huge mistake was made)
    ATPG possible partners: Split, Riedquat, Kagemusha (extremely risky day2, possible bus by not saving)
    Dave possible partners: Monty, Riedquat, Kagemusha, Salmon

    I still assert I'm townie, of course. If I were mafia, Riedquat would be the most likely partner, as I wouldn't make the mistake of voting with my partner Split on round 2, I could have saved Kagemusha, and Salmon was going down if he won the duel.

    For Jarema, Seon sticks out as a likely partner. Salmon is a possibility if the failure to unvote was an honest mistake.

    For ATPG, either Split or Riedquat are possibles. ATPG stands out as having been the very first to vote in many rounds. I called him out on the "mafia playing as super-townie" role and he admitted that this is one way he plays.

    Still a hard choice. Comments?

  5. #5
    Mmmm, Antares is tasty! Senior Member Alien Attack Champion Nightbringer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Your Dreams
    Posts
    2,782

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Good analysis dave. I have been thinking things over today and am feeling a bit more suspicious of ATPG than I had before. If you look at his round to round accusations, for the last few rounds he has made a strong case against a different person each round, and has been throwing accusations all over the place. I feel like this might have helped lead to a state of affairs where the town is having a hard time working together, as it has.

    I can believe that ATPG might pull something like this off as mafia. Going all in and throwing out cases on people as much as possible in order to overwhelm everyone with targets. What do you guys think?
    Moderator of The Throne Room
    “Being a Humanist means trying to behave decently without expectation of rewards or punishment after you are dead.” ― Kurt Vonnegut
    "Education: that which reveals to the wise, and conceals from the stupid, the vast limits of their knowledge." ― Mark Twain
    "Imagination is a quality given a man to compensate him for what he is not, and a sense of humor was provided to console him for what he is." ― Oscar Wilde
    “While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery.” ― Groucho Marx

  6. #6
    Do not Dis Member LazyMcCrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Caught in the net
    Posts
    1,281

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbringer View Post
    Good analysis dave. I have been thinking things over today and am feeling a bit more suspicious of ATPG than I had before. If you look at his round to round accusations, for the last few rounds he has made a strong case against a different person each round, and has been throwing accusations all over the place. I feel like this might have helped lead to a state of affairs where the town is having a hard time working together, as it has.

    I can believe that ATPG might pull something like this off as mafia. Going all in and throwing out cases on people as much as possible in order to overwhelm everyone with targets. What do you guys think?
    Town thought it was game over yesterday with two mafia left. I was allowed to kill SalmonSoil (the other scum) because I got lucky / it kept the game going. The only person who has been cranking the activity up because it was still all to play for is ATPG - who is your scum.

  7. #7
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbringer View Post
    I can believe that ATPG might pull something like this off as mafia. Going all in and throwing out cases on people as much as possible in order to overwhelm everyone with targets. What do you guys think?
    I think your odds of hitting scum will improve if you discard the tempting Pizzaguy as an option.

    I didn't wait until this final day round to post an analysis or my suspects, because I have not been trying to win on the final round of the game, I've been trying to lynch the scum before this round, giving reasons why people are or are not townie, and doing my best to organize some sort of final resistance.

    It is not at all advantageous to me to start pointing fingers at anyone last night where the scum can nightkill my top suspect and prove me wrong immediately. I have better strategic sense than that if my goal is to stay alive. My goal hasn't been to stay alive, it has been to correctly lynch someone.

    Serious analysis of my play will lead you to the correct conclusion.
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

  8. #8
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    My analysis of the game from last night still stands. I would like to know where Dave and Jarema stand on who their top suspect is, before I place my final verdict.

    Jarema, you're still my lead suspect. Why is Dave scum?

    Dave, if it is not Jarema it is you. Why is Jarema scum?
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

  9. #9
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Triple post-

    Feel free to ask me the same question, however I'll point out that I've already answered it with my analysis of the game. I ask you both to do the same.
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

  10. #10
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Still nothing.

    All right, will go over this one one more time.

    Quote Originally Posted by DaveShack View Post
    Thanks to Nightbringer for the early round tally summary, which I shamelessly copied.

    Day 1:
    Monty: 2 (ATPG, Tuuvi)
    ATPG: 1 (split)
    Nightbringer: 1 (Monty)
    White Eyes: 1 (Lazy)
    Lewwyn: 1 (Salmonsoil)
    Split: 1 (Arjos)
    Lazy: 2 (Bsmith, Nightbringer)
    Atheotes: 1 (Riedquat)
    Salmonsoil: 1 (Lewwyn)
    Arjos: 1 (Jarrema)
    D1 Jarema votes, Dave does not.

    Jarema's vote is a one-off and does not decide between the two candidates.

    Day 2:
    Tally:
    Kage: 1 (ATPG)
    Seon: 2 (Lazy, edse)
    Salmon: 2 (Daveshack, Split)
    Split: 3 (Kagemusha, Jarema, Nightbringer)
    Jarrema: 1 (Riedquat)
    Atheotes: 1 (Arjos)
    Nightbringer: 2 (BSmith, Atheotes)
    ATPG: 1 (Tuuvi)
    Daveshack: 1 (Salmon)
    D2, they both vote.

    Jarema lynches Split over Seon or Nightbringer or SalmonSoil, possibly indicating a preference/partnership since this vote is more decisive.
    DaveShack votes Salmon.

    Day 3:
    White_Eyes:D: 4 (edse, Arjos, atheotes, LazyMcCrow)
    Riedquat: 4 (Seon, SalmonSoil, Jarema, White_Eyes:D)
    Nightbringer: 1 (Riedquat)
    atheotes: 1 (Nightbringer)
    D3, Dave doesn't vote, Jarema ties Riedquat with W_E.

    If Dave were guilty it would be unlikely that Riedquat would be.

    Day 4:
    Nightbringer: 2 (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)
    Kagemusha: 3 (Arjos, Seon, atheotos)
    D4, neither Dave, nor Jarema, nor even myself, votes.

    Kagemusha is lynched by one vote. NB was murdered, nobody remaining reacts to Kage's death. Kagemusha is likely innocent and the mafia had no reaction to his death.

    Day 5:

    Tally:
    Arjos: 2 (Seon, Salmonsoil)
    Seon: 3 (ATPG, Arjos, DaveShack
    Nightbringer: 2 (LazyMcCrow, BSmith)
    D5, Dave puts the lynch to Seon. Jarema has no opinion.

    So far, Jarema's only truly decisive opinion has been the D2 lynch over Seon or Nightbringer or SalmonSoil.

    Salmon seems innocent, NB is proven so.

    It is possible, therefore, that Dave and myself actually lynched the scum on this day. It's possible Jarema did not want to spare Seon twice, as that creates a voting pattern.

    Day 6:
    Arjos - Pizza, Jarema, DaveShack
    DaveShack - Arjos
    ATPG - Salmon, Lazy
    D6- also possible that Arjos was guilty, distancing from Dave. However, Dave could have just lynched me instead, rendering this highly unlikely.

    I generally rule out Arjos as mafia here. The guilty party did indeed want him dead.

    Day 7:
    Salmon - ATPG, Lazy
    Lazy - Salmon, DaveShack
    ATPG - Jarema

    Salmon lynched
    Neither Lazy nor Salmon was guilty. However, myself and Dave seem to be attempting to lynch one of them.

    Jarema on the other hand is indecisive.


    My final analysis of the game on DaveShack and Jarema-

    1) Jarema's vote only makes a difference in the outcome on the following rounds: Day 2 and Day 6. D2 was Split, D6 was Arjos. Arjos seems unlikely to be mafia. Possible that Split was mafia, but neither myself nor DaveShack made any attempt to tie the vote and make him survive, and I don't believe Jarema was bussing. As such, I believe that Jarema did not lynch any mafia this game.

    2) DaveShack decides Seon, Arjos, and Lazy. If DaveShack is guilty, none of those are likely to be mafia. Lazy is not mafia, and Arjos is unlikely to be mafia at all. However, Seon was never ruled out as mafia.

    As for myself, I decided on Monty, Seon, Arjos, and Salmon for the lynch. Only Arjos seems clear, so it's very likely I lynched the mafia.

    I do not believe it was SalmonSoil, and I do not believe it was Arjos. Monty has been especially terrible this game, but I don't know if that makes him mafia. Plus, if I lynched Monty day 1 and he was guilty, why didn't I get murdered soon after?

    That leads me back to Seon.

    DaveShack and I lynched Seon, and Seon appears most likely to have been the guilty party we successfully lynched.

    Since he's voting incorrectly now, and lynched no scums...

    In the final analysis, Jarema is the weakest link. Good-bye.



    Vote: Jarema
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

  11. #11
    Know the dark side Member Askthepizzaguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    25,830

    Default Re: A History of Violence [In Play]

    Working on the assumption Seon is guilty, it's worth a double-check as to his contributions to the game as well.

    Easy enough, as he only has five posts.
    #Winstontoostrong
    #Montytoostronger

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO