A History of Violence [Concluded]

[Arjos]

Split's name references mental illness- conclusion, he's scum.

Who has any case on day one?

Atheotes is quiet- conclusion, he's scum.

As I said, I can't tell what they are up to, just writes vote: x and disappears...

WE avoids WOG- conclusion, he's scum.

Very oversimplified: he voted hours past the end, with the most flimsy reasonining I've ever read...

Kagemusha agrees about WE voting, WE murdered - conclusion, he's scum.

People agreeing on silly stuff, do that for an easy way out: for example Diana agreed about lynching you as host in Darkling...

Seon's vote moved- conclusion, he's scum.

Again, he unvoted many times basically with the only reason: "oh goodie, a wagon!"...

That, plus the fact that Arjos hasn't commented on pretty much anyone besides the folks he's voted for

I commented on your off-character behaviour and since then you've been more active for a start...
But if you want to know more:

- Crow and BSmith are a merry stubborn duo, whole game all they wanted was Nightbringer dead; what that makes them I don't know, usually townies are narrow sighted and adamant...
- Salmon, I've played with him only once, can hardly point out a pattern...
- Jarema and DS are pretty much giving concise reasons about their votes and then split, just like me, what does that makes us? Active players posting their views behind their votes, people open to arguments or mafia? Don't know, that's the game...
- ATPG, wasn't ATPG, now he survived 'til mid-game and wants me dead...

Could really the openly united duo being a mafia duo? Is bloodlust Salmon one of the vets? Are any of those blending in (Arjos, Jarema and DS) mafia? Is ATPG working on the fact that there haven't been many arguments in the game so far, exploiting it for the "last phases somewhat valid" argument to lynch opponents?
Hell I know! Who am I, the source of all knowledge? XD

Arjos is not behaving like everyone else, and it doesn't feel natural to me either.

I take great pleasure from that :)