A History of Violence [Concluded]

[DaveShack]

Do you mind my asking why?

Nerves of steel perhaps? Because a really violent reaction would be a scumtell, nonchalant like this seems a little more town.

???


ANyway, I am vote: ATPG

Let's just toss some votes out there and see which one sticks.

I agree that Daveshack is probably innocent. My inquiry wasn't to remove suspicion, at this point in the game, where lynching mafia is crucial, shouldn't we want to know everyone's reasons for voting? Which reminds me, Jarema it would be nice to know why you think Pizza is guilty.

I agree with Pizza on this, Jarema has only once actually given a reason for lynching someone. Lazy McCrow is also vague with his voting, although when asked he usually gives some reasons pretty quickly (10 minutes when I asked, 20 minutes one time earlier). This actually makes him more suspicious, as it seems he is closely watching this thread, always alert and ready to defend himself. It is possible though, that those are just the times he happens to be online. Also when he voted for Pizza and was asked to defend his vote he declined to give reasons.

So at the moment looks like I'm going to have to vote: Lazy McCrow

But if it looks like I'm going to be lynched by the end of the day I'm going to have to shift my vote to you, Pizza, simply because I am innocent and it is therefore better for me to see someone lynched who might possibly be guilty. Also I'm interested in Jarema's reasons for voting Pizza.

In defense of myself, the reason I only asked Lazy McCrow to give reasons for voting for me and didn't give my own suspicions at the time was that I was tired and just wanted to go to sleep. I thought that it would be best to give myself some more material to analyse when I woke up, and possibly also remove some suspicion from me.

Calls out Jarema's voting with no reasons, but then picks someone else. That someone else can't be Pizza because of the uber-townie post, and it can't be me or it would raise everyone's suspicions. Can't be Jarema if they're buddies, therefore Lazy is the only option.

I like your analysis, ATPG.
TBH, I did not have any real reason for voting for you. It was just a feeling that something is wrong with your gameplay.
Anyway, now I am torn between voting for Salmon and voting for Lazy.
Vote: LazyMcCrow, as this wagon has a chance of standing and hitting scum

Agrees with Pizza, but can't vote for buddy Salmon. And there is a valid bandwagon, so goes for it.

At this point I was 99% of the way to switching. I got into a whole lot of WIFOM -- is Pizza right and I've been played, or have I picked up on Lazy with a monumentally good catch? If I had taken another 10 minutes to work though the round's votes and redo my previous analysis, I'd have gone ahead and switched, but I could barely keep my eyes open.

We'll see in a bit which way it goes. First time I've been the swing vote at such an important point and I really don't know if I'm right or wrong.