A History of Violence [Concluded]

[Askthepizzaguy]

Udon;y kniow?

Here you go.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...nkards-tThread

Those mean sober people won't bother you annnnny more.

[Visor]

Thanks yuoul,.

[LazyMcCrow]

Drums spectral fingers against Visorslashs' clammy forehead

[Visor]

Drums spectral fingers against Visorslashs' clammy forehead

I'm fine now, writeup incoming. Probably going to take ages though. That was a fun night.

[Askthepizzaguy]

Probably going to take ages though. That was a fun night.

We're doomed.

[LazyMcCrow]

We're doomed.

I'm still expecting you to say 'Haha! I was mafiyar!'
But I guess that's just my way of postponing the apology I feel I probably owe you

[Askthepizzaguy]

I'm still expecting you to say 'Haha! I was mafiyar!'
But I guess that's just my way of postponing the apology I feel I probably owe you

You know guys, I'm one of the most talkative players with a long history of being mafia or townie.

I wonder, am I really that hard to read? Because you guys seem to get it backwards way more often than what I consider the norm. I give you plenty of information to go off of, you know where I stand on any given player for most of the game. There are games like the Campground or Trouble in Waiting where the living AND the dead are both screaming bloody murder for my head, and I'm a townie. Then I go through entire other games without much suspicion, being a dirtbag mafioso.

Do I post too much for serious analysis of my play to be done? Too much to read, so nobody wants to try to sit back and analyze it? Or do they do the analysis and it just comes up with an inaccurate result over and over?

I'm just curious, not ranting or anything.