that and Chariots being totally useless when an odd obstacle (aka a wall) appears, unlike cavalry, who are just considerably less usefull :D
that and Chariots being totally useless when an odd obstacle (aka a wall) appears, unlike cavalry, who are just considerably less usefull :D
"Who fights can lose, who doesn't fight has already lost."
- Pyrrhus of Epirus
"Durch diese hohle Gasse muss er kommen..."
- Leonidas of Sparta
"People called Romanes they go the House"
- Alaric the Visigoth
I believe chariots were not commonly used anymore during the timeframe of EB. I've read in some places that Gaugamela was the last battle in which they were used as an independent unit, and they failed. Alexander's phalanxes opened gaps in their lines through which the chariots drove and lost momentum, then slaughtered them in melee.
They were used at Magnesia with disastrous effects for the Seleucids who deployed them. In fact, their misuse might have caused the defeat of the Seleucids in that battle as they were driven back by missiles right into a camel corps which then fled through Antiochus' left flank completely disrupting the heavy cavalry stationed there and allowing Eumenes to rout them off the field easily.
I think Pontus also used them ineffectually against the Romans, perhaps at Chaeronea? I'm not sure atm.
From Frontline for fixing siege towers of death
x30 From mikepettytw for showing how to edit in game text.
From Brennus for wit.
Some good information on scythed chariots can be found here: http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/...dchariots.html.
Lance armed cavalry kill all chariots quite easily.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
[21:16:17] [Gaius - 5.115.253.115]
i m not camping , its elegant strategy of waiting
somehow i doubt it a charriot after gaining momentum is very hard to tackle down while the horseman of those days where probably mounting unsatled horses and had no sitrrups so a simple push and you could probably knockdown one of them from the horse
also horses where smalled then nowadays so 2 horses pulling 1 man would have been far more effective even if less manouverable (but hey scytched chariots where to be used against infantry and not cavlary)
good link also about the uses and missuses of the schytched chariot (altough why where they called schyted if they weren´t scythians ? )
I think because of the scythes on the wheels of the chariot?
rickinator9 is either a cleverly "hidden in plain sight by jumping on the random bandwagon" scum or the ever-increasing in popularity "What the is going on?" townie. Either way I want to lynch him. - White Eyes
Bookmarks