Obamacare Going Down?

[a completely inoffensive name]

And anyway, if there is a "conservative vs liberal" split involving how to interpret the constitution (orginalism etc), the problem is not "partisanship" but one side being wrong about how to interpret the constitution.

How is any side wrong in how to interpret the Constitution? It's a pretty fluid and vague document.

[Sasaki Kojiro]

How is any side wrong in how to interpret the Constitution? It's a pretty fluid and vague document.

Originalism vs living, they can't both be right.

[a completely inoffensive name]

Originalism vs living, they can't both be right.

Why not? Why can't we accept a degree of validity from both and simply pick from either side what is most prudent at the time?

[Sasaki Kojiro]

Why not? Why can't we accept a degree of validity from both and simply pick from either side what is most prudent at the time?

You aren't arguing for both you're arguing for living.

edit: which means I contradicted myself...your way of doing things would allow for being partisan, unlike strict originalism would would require the judge to stick to his method even if he didn't like the results politically.

[a completely inoffensive name]

You aren't arguing for both you're arguing for living.

Then living is correct.