Hey, nobody is hosting this Large Mafia [Concluded]

[DaveShack]

[*]Votes must be bolded.

I don't see anything about requiring Vote: , just that the vote must be bolded.

[DaveShack]

But just in case, that was indeed Vote: Visorslash.

[CountArach]

I don't see anything about requiring Vote: , just that the vote must be bolded.

It is Org tradition to bold the name of another member, so it would get confusing without the "Vote:" part.

This bandwagon is stupid. Vote: Arjos, for this post:

Oh yes, do help out your scumbrother in arms...

Vote: Visorslash

Keep in mind that this post is the one that started the current bandwagon and you might care to re-evaluate whether it is worth killing Visorslash.

[Kagemusha]

Vote: White eyes for starting the counter bandwagon.

[SalmonSoil]

Yeah I don't like this Visor wagon. I'm going to have to vote: Arjos

[Csargo]

Why don't you like it? The threat of memes adds to the excitement imo :cheer:

[Double A]

One cannot simply meme into mafia.

[Visor]

Posts incoming. All relating to mafia.







Sage advice:



Good times.

[Andres]

This bandwagon is stupid. Vote: Arjos, for this post:

Keep in mind that this post is the one that started the current bandwagon and you might care to re-evaluate whether it is worth killing Visorslash.

I don't like his reasoning for voting Arjos.

Why is it relevant that Arjos' vote started the bandwagon on Visorslash? As if Arjos could have had predicted that?

Trying to fabricate a reason for your vote is something scum often does. Mafia often feel the need to explain themselves, but because they are mafia, they need to fabricate something. And this reason for CA's vote on Arjos is so rubbish, that it sounds fabricated.

CA is scum.

[Beskar]

I think Chaotix might actually be town, because he would have typically responded with a laughing smilie then comment " Good logic", only to attempt to fool and trick me, he hasn't! So he isn't worried about being seen as scum.

[Chaotix]

I think Chaotix might actually be town, because he would have typically responded with a laughing smilie then comment " Good logic", only to attempt to fool and trick me, he hasn't! So he isn't worried about being seen as scum.

Or, maybe I specifically didn't comment to make you think that! You see, Mr. Beskar, I know how you think just as well as you know me.

I know that this is yet another post attempting to bait me to make a comment on it.

And I will not fall for it. No, I will most certainly not.

[Visor]

What's this Beskar/Chaotix thing...?

[Chaotix]

What's this Beskar/Chaotix thing...?

Goes back to some game a long time ago where I was mafia and Tiaexz (at that time called Beskar) figured it out and got me lynched or something like that. Then in ATPG's Star Wars I got a neutral role and since I suspected Tiaexz would be suspicious of me I first-night killed him. Funny part was that he was actually the mafia.

Ever since, in every game Tiaexz and I have been in, he has posted something about me not being mafia because I didn't first round kill him. Then he uses my response to that comment to determine I am mafia and get me lynched again.

It always works. It's pretty uncanny.

[CountArach]

I don't like his reasoning for voting Arjos.

Why is it relevant that Arjos' vote started the bandwagon on Visorslash? As if Arjos could have had predicted that?

Trying to fabricate a reason for your vote is something scum often does. Mafia often feel the need to explain themselves, but because they are mafia, they need to fabricate something. And this reason for CA's vote on Arjos is so rubbish, that it sounds fabricated.

CA is scum.

It was a better reason than people have for voting for Visorslash and I was fishing for a response from Arjos as much as anything. It also served to get a bit more attention that served to remind everyone why they were lynching Visor. At this point all our voting is still completely random so really there was never going to be any good reasoning behind a vote.

If I had truly wanted to vote for someone to deflect votes away from Visor or someone else I could have just voted for anyone who was bandwagoning him and that would have been valid enough. If I had wanted to keep a low profile I would have just added to the bandwagon. Of course that is WIFOM.

[Visor]

In regards to the above: It could either be townie trying to stop a lynch he thinks is wrong, or scum snuggling and trying to look good. It could be either and there are fair cases for it.

Good luck.

[Andres]

It was a better reason than people have for voting for Visorslash and I was fishing for a response from Arjos as much as anything. It also served to get a bit more attention that served to remind everyone why they were lynching Visor. At this point all our voting is still completely random so really there was never going to be any good reasoning behind a vote.

If I had truly wanted to vote for someone to deflect votes away from Visor or someone else I could have just voted for anyone who was bandwagoning him and that would have been valid enough. If I had wanted to keep a low profile I would have just added to the bandwagon. Of course that is WIFOM.

You felt the need to vote for someone and give a "legit" reason, but that "legit" reason you gave for voting was actually rubbish and sounded fabricated. That's why I think you're mafia.

[seireikhaan]

Vote: Visorslash

Choo choo

[CountArach]

You felt the need to vote for someone and give a "legit" reason, but that "legit" reason you gave for voting was actually rubbish and sounded fabricated. That's why I think you're mafia.

And giving no reason at all provides no discussion. Backing someone into a situation where they have to make some sort of comment on the game is better than nothing. Look at the discussion you've generated here for example. That's what I was hoping for.

[Visor]

And giving no reason at all provides no discussion. Backing someone into a situation where they have to make some sort of comment on the game is better than nothing. Look at the discussion you've generated here for example. That's what I was hoping for.

I've got nothing to comment on. The bandwagon just spiralled out of control.

[Andres]

And giving no reason at all provides no discussion. Backing someone into a situation where they have to make some sort of comment on the game is better than nothing. Look at the discussion you've generated here for example. That's what I was hoping for.

You were hoping for being accused and deemed suspicious?

Something smells fishy about you.

[Jarema]

I don't like his reasoning for voting Arjos.

Why is it relevant that Arjos' vote started the bandwagon on Visorslash? As if Arjos could have had predicted that?

Trying to fabricate a reason for your vote is something scum often does. Mafia often feel the need to explain themselves, but because they are mafia, they need to fabricate something. And this reason for CA's vote on Arjos is so rubbish, that it sounds fabricated.

CA is scum.

good point
unvote; vote: CountArach