Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk View Post
Agnosticism is the logical conclusion. Nothing we do provides any concrete evidence for or against a God. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. But then sketchy allegories aren't evidence of presence.

Actually, in science it is. Otherwise I could claim that there are dragons and magic in the world and there's absolutely no way for you to prove they don't exist.

I don't get how people can actually buy that reasoning.