Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
A. Nice false dichotomy.

But more importantly

B. If I could I would deconstruct marriage. The benefits of marriage should be given to any two or three or whatever people who file the paperwork with the gov.

Look. Ideally, I am a libertarian about this. Religious "Marriages" should be something that churches provide at their discretion everyone who actually wants their partnership to be recognized by the government fills out the same confusingly titled paperwork and are labelled the same as "Married".

But this isn't the world that any of us are going to live in. It's too big a change. The best thing to do is to start the deconstruction of this monstrosity of judeo-christian privilege by making gay partnerships equal.
Abolishing sexual prejudice by slices?

No, I don't accept that. If it's wrong it's wrong, preferencing homosexuals because they have a big media lobby against polyamorous groups, who potentially need the protection more because their living arrangements produce children naturally, is just even more wrong.

It's much more wrong than the current situation. It's like letting Methodists vote in England, but not Catholics.

Oh, and nice sideswipe at my "monstrous" religion.

I prefer your clever trolls though.