Ok Pizza, whilst I appreciate your lengthy analysis, I just checked and I'm not scum.
Now I know that lots of analysis is your style, but I find it hard to see why a townie murdered on night one would still care enough about the game to post such a hefty analysis this late. Its possible, but not likely. I just want everyone to keep that in mind when using Pizzas analysis.
So seeing as you are probably scum, who are you protecting? The obvious conclusion is that Jarema is your buddy, but seeing as town has only has two lynches left and you are providing two "obvious" lynches, it could be any of the other 3 players. Also to facilitate your two lynch plan you ignore the possibility that one scum may have already been lynched.
Now lets look at Jarema. Notice that the only time he came dangerously close to being lynched (other than the 4 way draw, which seems like more of a fluke seeing as it was on day 2), Bsmith, who voted for him, died the next night. But that seems like a risky scum move, so I dunno.
I agree that Atheotes has been probably too consistent to be scum. Which could also be a great cover if your scum buddy points it out for everyone. He has also been pretty successful at avoiding being targeted by anyone.
I just don't really know about Lazy, like you said he is a wild card.
Ishmael I'll ignore seeing as I think you are scum Pizza, and you clearly tried to incriminate him. Also most of your analysis was based around him being my buddy, which he isn't. However he has been keeping his head suspiciously low.
I'll start with vote: Atheotes because I think your being overly defensive of Jarema is probably just an attempt to cosy up to him and make him more likely to vote with you and your fellow scum. Of course, if someone is willing to make themselves more suspicious for me...
Bookmarks