Report is from 2010, which means it looks at years prior ffsOriginally Posted by HoreTore
Re: The Elephant in the room.
Report is from 2010, which means it looks at years prior ffs
Re: The Elephant in the room.
Sigh....
The report is from 2011. The data in it is from 2010 alone. It came out just over a year ago, in May 2011.
Your second video is from 2009, even though it says 2010, and has nothing to do with the report.
Last edited by HoreTore; 05-28-2012 at 22:14.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Re: The Elephant in the room.
just to egg-on Frags:
http://www.thelocal.se/28580/20100825/
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Re: The Elephant in the room.
Pretty shocking but I am not surprised. Good for Sweden that they are fed up with ignoring it though
Re: The Elephant in the room.
55 rapists - yes, that is of course reason enough t throw out half a million people and cause our economy to collapse overnight.
On a different note, Frags objected to my use of a book title because he believed the author was a nazi - yet he has no objections to a report produced by a nazi party....
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Re: The Elephant in the room.
A rapist is that. Ethnicity shouldn't come into it.
There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.
“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”
To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.
"The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."
Re: The Elephant in the room.
Of course not, but the study talks of foreign-born rapists not of their ethnicity, so we might infer they are first or second generation immigrants.
If that is the case, then it seems perfectly legitimate to question a policy of large-scale importation of violent and divisive crime that is not conducive to the welfare and wellbeing of YOUR citizens.
Of course that requires accepting the dictionary definition of discrimination rather than solely its modern nasty equivalent. I am okay with that, but it is a leap too far for some.
Quite simply; can you tolerate the extra rapes and child grooming in the name of niceness?
Last edited by Furunculus; 06-17-2012 at 23:29.
Furunculus Maneuver: Adopt a highly logical position on a controversial subject where you cannot disagree with the merits of the proposal, only disagree with an opinion based on fundamental values. - Beskar
Re: The Elephant in the room.
There are LOADS of reasons to kick immigrants out. I for one am not for it though, I am however for severely limiting further intake and use carrots to make those immigrants we don't want return to their birth countries.
Re: The Elephant in the room.
Hoho, you used the book as an example of a fascist attitude, I pointed out the writer was himself a nazi, no points
Re: The Elephant in the room.
No, then you misunderstood.
Anyway frags, you have no problem with neo-nazi's then?
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks