But I would say that you are interpreting the two as formal pieces of logic that conflict, when in reality they are fine within the context of informal speech.
It is perfectly fine to say it is always wrong for government to impinge on privacy and then advocate for it in certain cases because there is a another level that people consider beyond right/wrong which is necessary/not necessary. Do you have a problem with people saying that legalized abortion is morally wrong but necessary since I don't want the inevitable abortions to be done on women in backalleys?
Bookmarks