Proposed Sauro Rules Change

[Arjos]

Now that doesn't seem very far from the Sauromatae does it?

To their south were the remnants of the Skythioi; east of these the various groups of the Bosporos and north, north-east of them the Sauromatae: there was some relative distance...
But the proximity wasn't the point here, there aren't archaeological, nor written evidences of Sauros living in that area (or Slavs so far south); what exactly would justify the factional status for the slavic units?

[The Celtic Viking]

Yeah, I don't think proximity is enough for factional status. For example, Appea Gaedotos are very close to the Arverni, but they're still considered mercs for the Arverni, likewise with Arabians for Ptollies/AS. The proximity has put them on the roster, but I don't see it as a reason for making them factional as well.

[-Stormrage-]

i dont care, just give me a roster and a guy to smash into pieces.

[Kival]

Oh! I understand now, they are meant to get part of the factional list? I'M against that! I thought we only want to add units to the roster which would have been fine to me.

[Arjos]

I thought we only want to add units to the roster which would have been fine to me.

They already are as merc atm :)

[Kival]

They already are as merc atm :)

Yeah I realize it now. I thought we might add some additional germanic/slavic units or something like that.

[gamegeek2]

Well I think with the vojinos power-up it may re reasonable to assign them back to the non-factional list.

Updated proposal.