Cut short because you are obviously going to win an argument against a strawman which I never created or had any part in and what I did say taken out of context.
Analogy is incorrect due to some factors since there is still separation. It is like having six separate auditoriums (romantic comedy, stand-up comedy, thriller, drama, adventure and action) and instead of all six, there is now "comedy", "drama" and "adventure and action" merged. It is pointless having empty auditoriums when they can easily be side-by-side together enjoying constant input and energy from each other. There is no loss, only gain from such a merger.Let’s use the analogy of an auditorium to set that statement into perspective, shall we? If we have six separate auditoriums, discussing six different fields at their own pace we will get a circumstance that does generate more clarity, less confusion thus better discussions (and thus information) on whatever X then we would get if we took all those six auditoriums and their respective crowds and put them all into one single auditorium and then let them carry on as if nothing had happened.
I enjoy how you take statements completely out of context. I would like to see where I said "Total War is pointless for this forum" in any shape and form, and no, calling a couple of sub-sections as "redundant"(/pointless) as they impede total war discussion rather than encourage it does not in any shape of form imply anything remotely that you are suggesting.You regard TW-coverage as pretty pointless and so I would think it be rather self-explanatory that you are hardly suitable or ideal for determining such matters or how that coverage should be devised anywhere...
Personal experiences of a multitude of totalwar.org visitors is a very good indicator. But I guess I did the impossible of "not knowing that".How can you possibly know that? The rational answer is that you have no way in hell of knowing that, you have no actual means of knowing that universally
Bookmarks