Quote Originally Posted by Blxz View Post
All the cross quoting and links have made me rather confused. Exactly what are we debating here?

Is it:
-The origins of Egyptian civilization were from Nubian people.
-Egypt was populated with predominately dark-skinned central eastern tropical african peoples right through the entire history
-They were originally dark skinned but changed at a later date
Basically! As for the Egyptians essentially coming from Nubia, well that appears to now be the consensus amongst mainstream academics. Here is a link to the new publication by the Fitzwilliam, Oxford, and Yale academics who are now finally on board with acknowledging that ancient Egypt was originally black...

Quote Originally Posted by Blxz View Post
The Unbreakable seems to be focussing on the early period exclusively such as the transition between the pre-dynastic and the old kingdom while some of the others seem to be using the entire timeline with more focus on the New Kingdom.
When asking a question like this (the OP I mean), why would the origins not be of the utmost importance? Even with that said I have presented evidence showing that Amarna period (New Kingdom) pharaohs also shared the same biological affinities as those pharaohs of earlier time periods. Studies have been presented showing that genetically they were overwhelmingly Nilotic. Studies have also shown that Amarna period pharaohs also had skeletal morphologies consistent with Africans further to the south (both cranial and in limb proportions).