Is this really a passable argument for the dramatic game-changing effect you're trying to push? A little tip-weight leading to a weapon being decisively less effective in a fight between naked men compared with a simple straight sword but far more effective than a straight sword when each has a helmet, breastplate, and greaves? I thought tip-weighting was supposed to improve slash damage when one comes into contact with flesh?Originally Posted by Arjos Suadurix
The infantry-cavalry distinction I don't mind. Just note that the kopis and falcata are fine stabbing weapons and work a lot more like swords than axes, though they can have the bite of the latter.
Hmm, let's take a gander:right now a kopis has like 10 attack at best lol!
If you are referring to infantry well then...Originally Posted by EDU 3.4
Aside from this unit there are no Tier 4 (EB stat-wise) infantry armed with kopides. So that explains your statement, along with the fact that only Celts, Germans/Balts/Slavs, and Celticized Iberians receive the "barbarian bonus" to atk/def.Originally Posted by EDU 3.4
Bookmarks