Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: NFIB vs Sebelius

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. 06-29-2012, 17:06 #1
    Xiahou
    Xiahou is offline
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007
    Hall of Fame 2010
    Total Awards: 1



    Default Re: NFIB vs Sebelius



    How isn't this tax running afoul of the bill of attainder prohibition? If you have employer coverage, you're fine. If you don't, you have to buy coverage- if not, you get a special "tax"...

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
    A further admission that America would be better off with a public option. I recall that was in the original Bill but was dropped.
    Dropped because it was widely opposed.
    Last edited by Xiahou; 06-29-2012 at 17:13.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-29-2012, 20:49 #2
    Philippus Flavius Homovallumus
    Philippus Flavius Homovallumus is offline
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477



    Default Re: NFIB vs Sebelius

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    Dropped because it was widely opposed.
    See my point "C" above.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO