There's a problem with your post though, ajax.

I don't think just the miracle part isn't true. I think its more likely than not that the entire story is a fabrication. Why? Two things(I've already explained the first, but I'll repeat it):

1. Imagine you're a missionary. Of the kind that believes that the way to get people to believe, and thus be saved, is to have them see miracles performed. Then, you see an incident which you for some reason(see the discussion above) take as a miracle. Not just a regular one either, god has raised someone from the dead! What would you do about it? Of course the only logical answer is "spread the story to as many people as possible". After all, not doing so would condemn people to hell, and you've made it your lifes mission to prevent that. But has this happened in this alleged case? Nope. The only mention of it is on their own website. One would assume that if such an event had taken place, the boy raised from the dead would've been a poster boy for gods work on earth. But we have no knowledge of him, he has not been used in that way.

2. This story is one I have seen before. With slight modifications. It was printed in the newspaper Norge IDAG. It was translated, of course, but that wasn't all. Instead of being raised from the dead, the norwegian version only had her cured from some disease that made her paralyzed(can't remember what it was though). So, for both stories to be true, two nuns living in New South Wales were both visited by a couple in the 50's. Both had been miraculously cured 30 years ago, and their healing had been written in a book, which both couples happened to have with them. They also chose to reveal that it was them the book was about in the same way. The likelyhood of that being true is incredibly low, of course. Thus, we must conclude that one or both stories is a fabrication. I'd say it's most likely both are fabrications. As we now know that this organization has tried to pass fabrications off as truth, this ultimately improves the likelyhood of their other stories to be complete fabrications as well.

So in conclusion: in all likelyhood, the entire story is a complete fabrication.



Which again leads to the question of why they choose to lie when lying is forbidden by their religion.