Doctor Willenloss and his splendid invention, or... [Concluded]

**Askthepizzaguy** · 09-07-2012, 23:06

He could kill an additional townie instead. You don't win chess games by playing moves assuming your opponent will play moves that are also in your favor.

Simply put, you're being a dreamer in a situation where pragmatism rules and is the rule.

**Montmorency** · 09-07-2012, 23:10

Simply put, you're being a dreamer in a situation where pragmatism rules and is the rule.

That SK killed a couple of the scum.

IIRC, you spent that game proselytizing the end-times for Town.

But you are set. Fine. Six lynches ought to be enough for two scum at this stage, even if you happen to be one of them.

**Askthepizzaguy** · 09-07-2012, 23:13

You're right about one thing, there's no need when we have the time and the lynches and the suspects narrowed down.

The risk you're thinking about taking is unnecessary. The people town decides should die will be slain by town. Allowing a SK to "maybe" do us a solid, maybe if we were in a bind. I don't see us in a bind.

Kill Scum A, removes murder 1.

Lynch Scum B, removes a scum from team B. Much better than lynch town A and allow SK to kill town B.

**robbiecon** · 09-07-2012, 23:23

Lynch scum B, he uses time machine to rewind the day yet again ;)

**Montmorency** · 09-07-2012, 23:31

I'm afraid it's not that simple.

**Diana Abnoba** · 09-07-2012, 23:48

And if you truly had the time machine power you would already know that robbiecon, unless if you really are Igor, then you plan to let the mafia have use of it. Either way that post sealed my vote to you to stay.