The House of Origin [Concluded]

[Captain Blackadder]

Partner: General Hankerchief

Yes my General.

Vote:LazyMcCrow

[Andres]

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

1)

What are you talking about? A protection?

A.

Snapping up Pizza like that...

Look, we have three fine men (plus Double AA the possible traitor) prepared to die tonight. We are next in the killers' LoS, and we want to give them a slap before we go down.

Are you prepared, or are you anti-town?

2)

And who do you intend to kill?

A.

A vig. Protection is temporary. Death is permanent (for our purposes).

3)

So, you're suggesting to vig more than 1/3d of the playerfield?

On what basis?

And on what basis do you consider the other players not naughty?

A.

We have our naughty list. There are some (such as yourself) I'd like to include, but I'll keep it lean:

CB
Autolycus
Buddhafish
Doube A
Lazy McCrow

One of these must be lynched. Two need to die tonight. That's right, two. We ought to have enough prepared to stand and be counted to at least make the attempt.

I don't have great confidence in your trustiness, or your adherence to the Townie creed, but tell me now - do you count yourself among the dead and doomed?

Unvote ; Vote : Montmorency

I have no idea what information you gathered or how you gathered it, but trying to force me with not so veiled threats to help vig killing 5 players rubs me the wrong way.

[Montmorency]

Threaten you? I invited you. 5 players? Only one. If possible, two.

This is the last call for group actions. I intend to vig tonight - that's all in the clear. I need help. If you are town, stand and be counted. This is our last opportunity to hit the killers, as they'll control the lynch by tomorrow.

If you'd like to lynch me for organizing the final vig of the game, then you're flat-out scum: plain and simple.

[Montmorency]

Through and through.

This game has been a converse-opposite Buffy 2. Heh.

[Ishmael]

I'm going to do a complete backflip from my 'townie list' the other day and vote: Lazy McCrow

First off, the obligatory summary of vote posts:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

and Vote: Arjos for laughing

vote: Ishmael: like that

I didn't do it specifically to show you anything, although if you want your vote to count you should do it properly. I'm voting Ishmael again today too. I think he is a scum - or at least uses the word 'kill' alot. And he claimed you as his scum buddy day one, and I think he has the stones to try something so cheeky. And now there are snakes and bees as well as more vig killers than are probably sensible. Perhaps some more protection would be a better option?
vote: Ishamel

I agree. In the write-up it says that TinCow was some doddery old scholar - albeit apparently a vengeful vigilante one. Something quite zesty and zealous about Monty's interrogation.

vote: Montmorency

vote: Double A Reason being, he is clearly doing something else when he is letting people down.

I won't read too much into these - Lazy seems to be going for easy votes throughout, but I'm guilty of that myself more often than not. Consider this supporting evidence.

...in fact, now that I write this I don't actually have that much by way of evidence, except for a gut feeling and the fact that we have no idea what he's been up to this whole time. So, Lazy McCrow, what have you been doing this whole time? Vigging, protecting, moping around because you partner died N1...?

[autolycus]

Why am I not on the WOG list, because although I haven't been voting like I should, (sorry about that), I have been active at night. I am Heshin, the named character that has showed up the last few nights, (although I didn't have a name in my PM, I'm just a generic townie). My partner claims to be a townie power role that makes the two of us function as a full set of four (see our protection of TinCow and our kill of White_Eyes). He's either that or scum, but for the moment, I trust him, since we can stick us on protection duty. On that note, I will take suggestions as to who we should attack or protect tonight.

We have three problematic roles, for sure, as far as I can see: Kill man, the religious zealot, and whatever caused Hashell's partner to go bonkers, which might mean Hashell is scum, might mean his partner is scum, and might mean a third person with control powers.

Vote: Montmorency While his attacker doesn't seem to be vanilla (solo who seemed to have a chance), he also seems to be unvanilla (his protectors didn't seem to succeed, it seems to have been his own skill that enabled his survival)

[Andres]

Threaten you? I invited you.

You made it clear you consider me untrustworthy and that you consider anyone not willing to cooperate as scummy. You're also organising vig squads. As I said: not so very well veiled threats.

5 players? Only one. If possible, two.

As if you plan to stop after next night.

This is the last call for group actions. I intend to vig tonight - that's all in the clear. I need help. If you are town, stand and be counted. This is our last opportunity to hit the killers, as they'll control the lynch by tomorrow.

If you'd like to lynch me for organizing the final vig of the game, then you're flat-out scum: plain and simple.

Instilling fear in the town instead of giving outlined cases and reasons.

"Work with me or you're doomed/scum."

[Riedquat]

Hahaha.... to many seems autolycus!

One thing, Atpg, while i have my suspicion on Ishmael I fail to see how the attack on joank has something to do with him.

Who was the original partner of Arjos?

[LazyMcCrow]

I'm going to do a complete backflip from my 'townie list' the other day and vote: Lazy McCrow

So, Lazy McCrow, what have you been doing this whole time? Vigging, protecting, moping around because you partner died N1...?

See my partner, autolycus' post above. I am Elsehan, Royal Master of Arms. I am able to kill or protect with just the help of my partner with 100% success. N1 my effort to protect TinCow was not successful, because my original partner Thermal did not show up for the game at all. Me and auto successfully protected TinCow N2 and last night we killed WhiteEyes...poosibly a mistake. However - as my erstwhile companion pointed out - more likely to hit scum next time! Which of course I am more than willing to do in order to convince you that I speak the truth. I shall hope not to be lynched, and indeed for some protection of course, but given the shoddy attempts by most of you at protecting so far, I won't expect it. I'd be interested to hear who you think I should demonstrate my legendary swordsmanship on, and whether you'd like to see me and auto vig or protect.

[Ishmael]

Either you're incredibly gutsy scum, or you're telling the truth. I'm inclined to believe the latter.

unvote, vote: Andres

Next on the 'I've got this hunch' list.

[autolycus]

Just confirming for you all that LazyMCCrow is indeed my partner :)

[Andres]

Either you're incredibly gutsy scum, or you're telling the truth. I'm inclined to believe the latter.

unvote, vote: Andres

Next on the 'I've got this hunch' list.

Your hunch is wrong. But don't let that stop you from voting me over the bloodthirsty Montmorency who asks help killing 5 players at night because they... well, because otherwise you're either scum or doomed.

[Montmorency]

I must step in for a moment, if only to reply to Andres: I fully expect to be killed tonight, should I survive the lynch. I just want to kill scum - you want to prevent that. You've said as much.

Your lawyerly vituperation can't mask the fact that you are anti-town.

"Bloodthirsty": And the Mafia are peace-loving citizens of the United Scum Republic of Gameroom, right?

[Andres]

I don't want to prevent the killing of scum, but I do want to prevent scum ordering townies to do their dirty work and cause their own doom.

Either you tell us why exactly we need to kill those people or you're just trying to pull us over to do something against our own interest by making us scared.

"Kill X or you'll lose this game" simply doesn't sound very convincing. Why is X considered scum?

[Visor]

Vote: Andres

Already stated reasons.

[Andres]

Vote: Andres

Already stated reasons.

I haven't been very active behind the scenes and I haven't been active in the thread neither. That is correct. Why that should be a reason to vote me, goes beyond me, really.

[GeneralHankerchief]

Unvote: Ishmael
Vote: ATPG

I'm not sure why you're pushing the Andres thing so hard.

[Andres]

I'm assuming that's going on behind the scenes?

There's not much to defend against if I don't even know what the case against me is.

So far, people have blamed me for 1) not blindly following Montmorency and asking critical questions; 2) not being active enough.

As for 1), well, meh. And for 2), also meh.

[Choxorn]

Partner: Visorslash

Vote: Ishmael

[Double A]

It just reoccured to me that I need a partner. Anyone left?

[Riedquat]

Unvote: Ishmael
Vote: ATPG

I'm not sure why you're pushing the Andres thing so hard.

I'm assuming that's going on behind the scenes?

+1 to this...

What call my attention is Andres and Atpg are choosing each other as partners, whats the point if Atpg is pushing for the lynch of Andres? I'm dead confused here. Or is the other way around? He is defending Andres? Defending him of what?

[Montmorency]

"Kill X or you'll lose this game" simply doesn't sound very convincing.

I never said that. I said I want to strike the scum a blow before we lose, as they will control the lynch tomorrow.

Guess what, Andres? I can't really cause harm if all townies rally to me - because only scum will be left!

15 now, -3 for the lynch and WoKs. Then what, another 4 or 5 anti-town kills, bringing it to 8 or 7. If there are only 8 or 7, then that's game over - town can't win if it is outnumbered.

The least we can do is vig to kill one of them, as a revenge maneuver.

Why are you so against their vigs, huh Andres? I don't see you offering alternatives! Is it perhaps because the names I listed are part of the scum consortium? This isn't righteous indignation, Andres, but a pretense and a red herring.



@Askthepizzaguy: What do you have to say about Andres?

[Jarema]

vote: Andres seems to be good course of action

[Riedquat]

Guess what, Andres? I can't really cause harm if all townies rally to me - because only scum will be left!

I agree with the first part but for the second...

[Montmorency]

To rephrase: if all the townies come to one side of the room, everyone left on the other side will be scum - thus making successful vigs a near-certainty. That's the meaning.

[GeneralHankerchief]

To rephrase: if all the townies come to one side of the room, everyone left on the other side will be scum - thus making successful vigs a near-certainty. That's the meaning.

I really doubt that the game will be this easy to "solve".

[Montmorency]

I really doubt that the game will be this easy to "solve".

These words, they are not mine! I want to kill one scumbag, maybe even two, tonight. If that happens, then maybe, just maybe, we'll have a chance in the lynch.

I'm not going to guarantee that. I'd never be able tot. I will, however, guarantee that scum will die if vigs are prosecuted tonight. And hey, guys, you can even deliberate as to the targets. Town still has at least that much strength left! I'm just here to provide sensible targets and try to ensure that you don't hit players that were publicly cleared.

[Riedquat]

I'm just here to provide sensible targets and try to ensure that you don't hit players that were publicly cleared.

Like who? Sorry, but I fail to see them!

[LazyMcCrow]

exactly. Who in your opinion is 'definitely' scum Monty?

[Montmorency]

How about my opinions on who very likely isn't scum, at this very moment, ranging from cleared by writeups to recent reveals:

Lazy Crow
Autolycus
GH
Visorslash
Ishmael
Montmorency
ATPG

Does this help?