That's nice, but it does not answer my question :)
What are you trying to do here? Pigeon-hole me into saying something specific? I am saying it is imperative that you try to avoid curtailing certain (preferably all) civil liberties or deny due process to certain (preferably all) individuals. I am saying that in the 1860s, the American people were pushed to a breaking point that can be objectively considered reasonable, whether you agree with it or not (and surely I would have been one of the people who was mad at hell as Lincoln, regardless of which side of the conflict I lived on).
Our country today has reached no such breaking point. The people capitulated and gave up their liberties without a fight, without batting an eyelash, and absolutely without proper resistance. 3000 people died in a tragedy in New York, and that's all it took to break the country, and give in to the terror.
"And if the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war and not popularity seeking. If they want peace, they and their relatives must stop the war." - William Tecumseh Sherman
“The market, like the Lord, helps those who help themselves. But unlike the Lord, the market does not forgive those who know not what they do.” - Warren Buffett
Bookmarks