I think the American way of dealing with minorities is much more effective than the methods we use in Europe. In our desire not to offend anyone, I think it's been more offensive than anything else. Rather than treating everyone equally, we have the tendency to treat (the Muslim) minorities like children. I think it's extremely patronising.
We don't know. For example, the Safavids had a relatively liberal policy religion-wise, but even though the rule of Shah Abbas went hand-in-hand with an increase of Iranian art and culture and religious freedom (well, except for Sunnis) we can't really speak of a period of scientific prowess. We have to be extremely careful in trying to tie religious freedom with scientific progress. I don't believe it's that simple.Freedom of expression leads to a discussion and interchange and what is called in philosophy a new dialectic; a new 'paradigm' to use the Khunian term. It brings progression from one understanding to another. The reason perhaps why the Islamic states fell behind the West (when previously they had been ahead) is precisely because of 'religious bigotry' (for want of another phrase) that cannot accept these God given rights - for to say "that anyone anywhere can say what they wish" means it is a God given right. Even if you a point a gun at my head you cannot stop me saying as I wish; that is my right.
People still write "Muslim" that way? In any case, I think it's kinda telling that you're talking about Christian countries here, instead of anything else. Secular, for example. That's quite an important difference.It is totally absurd and outrageous for Moslems to call for suppression of freedom of expression and speech in Christian countries.
Bookmarks