Well, if that's the case "assuming control of the account itself" is the "tool".Drunk Clown, they don't have the "tools" for looking at your PMs, they probably got access by assuming control of the account itself. Saying that admins have tools to look at PMs will need to unnecessary FUD. In the right circumstances, a ban is correct and ethical - even if only founded on suspicions. Reading a member's PMs most certainly is not ethical by anyone's standards.
Guilty until proven innocent is the worst thing you can do.
You think it's ethical to punish someone who hasn't done anything wrong? You want to punish someone without evidence?
Bookmarks