lol wtf :P
We do not sow.
im still flabbergasted.
We do not sow.
Good to know facts. We have a "rejection center" that rewards us when we are rejecting information we're disagreeing (in particlar with an aggressive response, and that's more or less the standard response to bizzare theories). We also have a justification center. In that center we're always right, no matter how bizzare it seems, even for us. So to make up that we're right, we'll make up theories even if it's bizarre.
As pointed out in the article, have enough emotional input into something and you have to be right in this, in particular if you did something evil (to say sub-humans) or was exposed for something nasty (that you deny was something nasty).
Alternate is not being able to comprehend the other person/action. If you can't understand that anybody can be so nice (or evil), then you'll need to make up something in terms you can comprehend.
Of course, sometimes things leaks through, so we have to be even more bizarrre in the denial. Nazis=good, holocaust=evil, so to keep nazis=good, then holocaust can't have happened.
We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?
Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED
Bookmarks