Results 1 to 30 of 33

Thread: Explaining belief in the absurd

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    any reason why you would call the former absurd and the latter not? or is that for us to disect? just wondering.

    aparantly being absurd is being grossly unreasonable. if you take being unreasonable to mean being irrational and being irrational to mean that people who act in a way that is inconsistent (for example doing something counter- or unproductive) with their other views or goals believing or doing something absurd would be the following: have the goal to get to play A in the fastest way possible and then knowingly take the longest route to place A. Or since doing something absurd is grossly unreasonable thus grossly irrational it would be a more extreme example such as believing that killing people is bad and worship Stalin as your personal hero.
    To take "absurd" first: I'm using "absurd" to describe something that is both impossible and culturally/socially inappropriate(which is basically the psychiatric use of the term, which is what I'm using). Ie., it must describe something that simply cannot be the truth, and it can't be a common opinion either. Like September Clues, for example. It's just no way there were no planes on 9/11, that's clearly impossible. It's also clearly socially inappropriate.

    As for my separation, yeah, that's open for debate too. I think there's a big difference between the two though, the first list seems much crazier than the second list. Therefore I think they can be explained differently. Still, I'm interested in arguments against that and explanations for the second list too, of course. To continue with the 9/11 example, it's relatively common to believe that some poweful elite group controls a lot of things behind the scenes. Exactly what group that is varies wildly, of course. So, stating that group X were the real perpetrators on 9/11 really isn't that shocking to relatively many. But yeah, it's still pretty damn whacko.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  2. #2
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    How about telling your kids about santa claus? its both impossible and lying which is socially inappropriate. :P

    does the absurd has to be both impossible and culturally/socially inappropriate or can it be either impossible or culturally/socially inappropriate or both? If it is the former I dont really see why it has to, for me belief in the clearly impossible (according to ones own views) is already rather absurd.

    yet at the same time, often people regard something as absurd even if its not impossible but only culturally/socially inappropriate. (such as the belief hitler was a good man for example)
    Last edited by The Stranger; 09-23-2012 at 19:15.

    We do not sow.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    That anything exists at all. It'd be plenty easier for there to be nothing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisherking View Post
    Example: most all of us, I am sure, believe in the existence of the outer planets but very few of us have looked into a telescope and seen them. We merely take others at their word as proof of their being.
    You're not taking into account pictures and video (i.e. evidence). Watch Hubble 3D. Mind-blowing stuff.
    Last edited by naut; 09-23-2012 at 19:22.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

  4. #4
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger View Post
    How about telling your kids about santa claus? its both impossible and lying which is socially inappropriate. :P

    does the absurd has to be both impossible and culturally/socially inappropriate or can it be either impossible or culturally/socially inappropriate or both? If it is the former I dont really see why it has to, for me belief in the clearly impossible (according to ones own views) is already rather absurd.

    yet at the same time, often people regard something as absurd even if its not impossible but only culturally/socially inappropriate. (such as the belief hitler was a good man for example)
    That's a different subject than what I made this thread for.

    I think that's interesting as well though, so if you want to discuss it further, I can create another thread for it.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  5. #5
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    allright, i thought your question was twofold, but you only want us to come up with beliefs people actually have that would be absurd according to the definition you gave?

    im interested in the other subject, i will probably write my thesis about belief in general and i hadnt actually thought about belief in the absurd that much which is actually quite interesting so im happy you brought it up :P

    We do not sow.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member gaelic cowboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    mayo
    Posts
    4,833

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    Something makes me suspect that were just hardwired to prefer anecdotal evidence from an evolutionary perspective.

    If we decide to not eat mushrooms because we felt sick this will probably will not remove us from the genepool, but if we continue to eat the mushrooms of differant kinds this could kill us.

    Essentially making a sweeping general choice safeguards us and allows us pass on our genes, nowadays were likely not a risk from eating a forest mushroom but our brains still make those same choices.
    Last edited by gaelic cowboy; 09-25-2012 at 14:59.
    They slew him with poison afaid to meet him with the steel
    a gallant son of eireann was Owen Roe o'Neill.

    Internet is a bad place for info Gaelic Cowboy

  7. #7

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    Quote Originally Posted by gaelic cowboy View Post
    Something makes me suspect that were just hardwired to prefer anecdotal evidence from an evolutionary perspective.

    If we decide to not eat mushrooms because we felt sick this will probably will not remove us from the genepool, but if we continue to eat the mushrooms of differant kinds this could kill us.

    Essentially making a sweeping general choice safeguards us and allows us pass on our genes, nowadays were likely not a risk from eating a forest mushroom but our brains still make those same choices.
    Where does preference on anecdotal evidence factor into humanities natural tendency to imagine and create? Anecdotal evidence usually relies on something having an effect on you, not the other way around. It's logic and critical thinking that has someone shaping a handle for a tool to create more torque.


  8. #8
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Explaining belief in the absurd

    Quote Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name View Post
    Where does preference on anecdotal evidence factor into humanities natural tendency to imagine and create? Anecdotal evidence usually relies on something having an effect on you, not the other way around. It's logic and critical thinking that has someone shaping a handle for a tool to create more torque.
    Actually, it's isn't logic and critically thinking - logic and critical thinking is how you develop an idea, not how you come up with one.


    Anecdotal observation is how you conclude that logs rolls better than sleds, so putting logs under your sleds would be a good idea.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO