Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I play?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Uergobretos Senior Member Brennus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Korieltauuon.
    Posts
    7,801

    Default Re: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I pl

    I would suggest H/M. Epeiros and the Carthaginian cities in Sicily will be a walkover but once you find yourself stuck in campaigns in Iberia, Africa and Greece (as always happens when the going is initially easy) you will find it delightfully challenging. The Lusotannan in particular will be a real challenge.



    donated by ARCHIPPOS for being friendly to new people.
    donated by Macilrille for wit.
    donated by stratigos vasilios for starting new and interesting threads
    donated by Tellos Athenaios as a welcome to Campus Martius


  2. #2
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I pl

    VH/M. You can handle it.

    I think that a lower setting of H/M would be justifyable for some smaller factions, but certainly not the Romans. Italy itself has amazing economic potential and you have an unparalelled choice of where to expand.

    The biggest annoyances in my old Roman campaign were the continuous assaults of the Sweboz from the north. I solved this by conquering the two cities in the Alps between us, made them Type IV client kingdoms and used native troops (lots of slingers in particular) to repel the occasional siege. It was quite managable.

  3. #3

    Default Re: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I pl

    Quote Originally Posted by Kralizec View Post
    VH/M. You can handle it.

    I think that a lower setting of H/M would be justifyable for some smaller factions, but certainly not the Romans. Italy itself has amazing economic potential and you have an unparalelled choice of where to expand.

    The biggest annoyances in my old Roman campaign were the continuous assaults of the Sweboz from the north. I solved this by conquering the two cities in the Alps between us, made them Type IV client kingdoms and used native troops (lots of slingers in particular) to repel the occasional siege. It was quite managable.
    it would be more than an occasional siege. For me, when I played romans they sweboz would have a pattern for attacking me. So they would send 2-4 stacks one after the other and then be quiet for a few years before they did the thing again

  4. #4
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I pl

    Well, maybe some background information from my campaign would explain it.

    The Sweboz first attacked me from the alps. I was allied with the Averni. They were getting rapidly exterminated by the Aedui and Sweboz. I intervened: destroyed the Aedui, drove the Sweboz out of Gaul and gave the Averni most of the Gallic provinces. The motivation was that I really didn't want to conquer Gaul in an early stage for myself; I wanted to be able to face the Gauls in late game.
    I also took those two cities in the Alps (the two directly north of Italy) from the Sweboz so that I had a buffer against them, consisting of Type IV client states. Because I had beefed up the Averni considerably by now, and becaus I had launched a couple of punitive raids against the Sweboz, they never became much of a threat again. They still attacked my two Alp cities regularly but rarely with full stacks. Usually I could decimate a besieging army in one turn with mostly slingers. It's an annoyance to be sure, but nothing major.

  5. #5

    Default Re: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I pl

    Quote Originally Posted by Kralizec View Post
    I also took those two cities in the Alps (the two directly north of Italy) from the Sweboz so that I had a buffer against them, consisting of Type IV client states. Because I had beefed up the Averni considerably by now, and becaus I had launched a couple of punitive raids against the Sweboz, they never became much of a threat again. They still attacked my two Alp cities regularly but rarely with full stacks. Usually I could decimate a besieging army in one turn with mostly slingers. It's an annoyance to be sure, but nothing major.
    Did you not consider giving the two cities in the Alps to the Arveni or Aedui instead? The Sweboz AI will not attack you if it doesn't share a border with you, hence creating buffer states controlled by other factions can be more useful than creating Type IV governments - the AI doesn't care what the government level is, it regards those towns as yours and the AI tends to regard the human player as the primary target, especially on higher difficulty levels.

  6. #6
    Sovereign Oppressor Member TIE Fighter Shooter Champion, Turkey Shoot Champion, Juggler Champion Kralizec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,812

    Default Re: After a break will be starting a Roman Campaign, which difficulty lvl should I pl

    I'm aware of that, but I didn't expect that the Averni would be able to keep those towns.

    For various I often go out of my way to prop up my allies. In my experience if you save a faction from extinction by returning key provinces to them, they're still not be competitive with their enemies and will usually lose their newly gained cities in a couple of years.

    Giving the Alp cities to the Averni and making peace with the Sweboz would merely have made the Averni their main target, and probably would have lost some of the Gallic cities again that I worked so hard to acquire for them. Because I stayed at war with the Sweboz however I divert some of the forces that would otherwise have been sent against my ally.
    Last edited by Kralizec; 09-27-2012 at 23:19.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO